1965
DOI: 10.1037/h0021785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cue and secondary reinforcement effects with children.

Abstract: Groups of children served in a lever-pulling experiment in order to determine the secondary reinforcement, cue, and combined secondary reinforcement/cue effects of a light stimulus. On each conditioning trial the light was differentially associated with the presentation of a primary reinforcement. After conditioning, Ss underwent a period of extinction during which time a lever pull resulted in a light or a no-light condition. An evaluation of the number of responses during extinction showed a significant diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It ma}r be noted in passing, however, that other recent studies are not so confirmatory. Ignoring the negative results in the present three studies, two others report negative results (Kass, Wilson, & Sidowski, 1964;Longstreth, 1962), while one reports positive results (Sidowski, Kass, & Wilson, 1965). Further, the author is aware of three unpublished studies, all of which report negative results (Donaldson, 1961;Estes, 1960;Hall, 1964).…”
Section: Concluding Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…It ma}r be noted in passing, however, that other recent studies are not so confirmatory. Ignoring the negative results in the present three studies, two others report negative results (Kass, Wilson, & Sidowski, 1964;Longstreth, 1962), while one reports positive results (Sidowski, Kass, & Wilson, 1965). Further, the author is aware of three unpublished studies, all of which report negative results (Donaldson, 1961;Estes, 1960;Hall, 1964).…”
Section: Concluding Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…When the S D is later presented contingent on a response, a reinforcement effect is seen. This approach was used in some early laboratory studies on conditioned reinforcement with children with and without disabilities (e.g., Lovaas et al 1966;Sidowski, Kass, and Wilson 1965), and its effects have recently been demonstrated with children diagnosed with ASD Isaksen and Holth 2009;TaylorSanta, Sidener, Carr, and Reeve 2014). Isaksen and Holth (2009) compared the rate of arbitrary responses that produced either the S D from a discrimination training procedure or the paired stimulus from a stimulus pairing procedure.…”
Section: Other Procedures For Establishing Conditioned Reinforcersmentioning
confidence: 99%