2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu2O as a promising cathode with high specific capacity for thermal battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the voltage decreases from 100 to 70 V under a current density of 6 A/ cm 2 in the Ni-NiCl 2 battery at 25 s. The voltage drop in the Ni-NiCl 2 system (Figure 7A) is 30 V and the corresponding internal resistance is 0.12 Ω (Figure 7B), which is significantly lower than that of the FeS 2 (70 V, 0.28 Ω) and CoS 2 (65 V, 0.26 Ω) thermal batteries. Moreover, as shown in Figure 7C, the activation time of the Ni-NiCl 2 battery is significantly lower than those of previously reported thermal batteries (Liu and Chu, 2004;Yu et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;Gui et al, 2020;Guo et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2020), which indicates the quick response ability of the battery. The power density of Ni-NiCl 2 (11.4 kW/kg), as shown in Figure 7D, is considerably higher than those of several previously reported electrode materials (Zhu et al, 2012;Yu et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;Gui et al, 2020;Guo et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the voltage decreases from 100 to 70 V under a current density of 6 A/ cm 2 in the Ni-NiCl 2 battery at 25 s. The voltage drop in the Ni-NiCl 2 system (Figure 7A) is 30 V and the corresponding internal resistance is 0.12 Ω (Figure 7B), which is significantly lower than that of the FeS 2 (70 V, 0.28 Ω) and CoS 2 (65 V, 0.26 Ω) thermal batteries. Moreover, as shown in Figure 7C, the activation time of the Ni-NiCl 2 battery is significantly lower than those of previously reported thermal batteries (Liu and Chu, 2004;Yu et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;Gui et al, 2020;Guo et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2020), which indicates the quick response ability of the battery. The power density of Ni-NiCl 2 (11.4 kW/kg), as shown in Figure 7D, is considerably higher than those of several previously reported electrode materials (Zhu et al, 2012;Yu et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;Gui et al, 2020;Guo et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Moreover, as shown in Figure 7C, the activation time of the Ni-NiCl 2 battery is significantly lower than those of previously reported thermal batteries (Liu and Chu, 2004;Yu et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;Gui et al, 2020;Guo et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2020), which indicates the quick response ability of the battery. The power density of Ni-NiCl 2 (11.4 kW/kg), as shown in Figure 7D, is considerably higher than those of several previously reported electrode materials (Zhu et al, 2012;Yu et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;Gui et al, 2020;Guo et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2020). In addition, the comparison of the power density of the present thermal batteries is summarized in Supplementary Table S2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, it could be expected that the discharge performance of LiCu 2 O 2 would be more excellent than that of LiCu 3 O 3 . Thermal stability is one of the important indicators for thermal battery cathode (Jin et al, 2018;Luo et al, 2020). As shown in Figure 5A, LiCu 2 O 2 began to decompose to LiCuO, Cu 2 O, and O 2 at around 680 • C. The weight loss at 380 • C was about 1.81%, which was mainly caused by the decomposition of Li 2 CO 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuprite Cu2O is known to have a low value of thermal expansion coefficient around room temperature, and to exhibit a negative thermal-expansion behavior at low temperatures. The thermal decomposition temperature of Cu2O exceeds 900 O C. So, for the high temperature processing of CIGS material, may not have any serious effect of the Cu2O layer [38]. Moreover, there is possibility of Cu diffusion in CIGS material at the rear end which can change the CIGS bandgap and its performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%