1991
DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(91)90082-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT studies of brittle failure in castlegate sandstone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CT mat is determined by averaging the single modes of all CT numbers at every pressure stage, assuming that the most frequent CT number dominates the matrix of the rock sample. Our results reveal a matrix number of CT mat = 1862 HU, which is in line with other CT-based sandstone studies (Akin and Kovscek, 2003;Huo et al, 2016;Vinegar et al, 1991). Careful calibration with different spacers (0.19, 0.29, 0.41, 0.52 mm) within the fracture indicates a slope of the linear calibration line of 5890 ± 38.3 HU mm −1 (Fig.…”
Section: Image Processingsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CT mat is determined by averaging the single modes of all CT numbers at every pressure stage, assuming that the most frequent CT number dominates the matrix of the rock sample. Our results reveal a matrix number of CT mat = 1862 HU, which is in line with other CT-based sandstone studies (Akin and Kovscek, 2003;Huo et al, 2016;Vinegar et al, 1991). Careful calibration with different spacers (0.19, 0.29, 0.41, 0.52 mm) within the fracture indicates a slope of the linear calibration line of 5890 ± 38.3 HU mm −1 (Fig.…”
Section: Image Processingsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In the past, in situ imaging of experiments based on CT technologies was applied to a wide range of studies including geomechanical behavior of fractures (Re and Scavia, 1999), evaluations of triaxial tests (Feng et al, 2004;Ge et al, 2001;Lenoir et al, 2007;Ren and Ge, 2004;Vinegar et al, 1991;Zhou et al, 2008), shear tests (Tatone and Grasselli, 2015), sand production experiments (Santos et al, 2010) as well as various single-/multi-phase core-flooding experiments in fractured and unfractured rocks (Huo and Benson, 2015;Krevor et al, 2012;Oh et al, 2013;Perrin and Benson, 2010;Pini and Benson, 2013;Pini et al, 2012;Rangel-German et al, 2006;Schembre and Kovscek, 2003;Shi et al, 2009;Watanabe et al, 2011). CT technology generally represents a 3-D non-destructive method to image material contrasts in high resolution and, therefore, is well suited to reproduce dynamic processes in situ and in "real time".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the spatial distribution of minerals in the solid matrix is relatively homogeneous, then the average CT-number in a given area can be approximated as linearly related to the porosity (VINEGAR et al, 1991;DESRUES et al, 1996). In a plot of the grey level versus density (Fig.…”
Section: X-ray-computed Tomography: Density and Porosity Contrastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates a uniformly stable and deformable pore structure that could support additional mechanical strength with increased deformation. Although no pore volume compressibility test reported in this paper was conducted up to the pressure causing mechanical failure of the core plug, the ability for CT to easily detect fractures within cores can be very useful in identifying samples that failed mechanically during such a test (Vinegar et al 1991).…”
Section: Porosity Fractionmentioning
confidence: 98%