2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT Image Reconstruction Based on GPUs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Efficiency. Reconstructions of high-quality CT images are extremely computationally demanding tasks (Flores et al, 2013). Recently, image processing using the GPU of a computer has become more popular as the computational performance of GPUs has surpassed that of the CPU with the advent of powerful GPUs for computer games (Eklund et al, 2013).…”
Section: Software Parameters For Image Calibrations and Artifact Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Efficiency. Reconstructions of high-quality CT images are extremely computationally demanding tasks (Flores et al, 2013). Recently, image processing using the GPU of a computer has become more popular as the computational performance of GPUs has surpassed that of the CPU with the advent of powerful GPUs for computer games (Eklund et al, 2013).…”
Section: Software Parameters For Image Calibrations and Artifact Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are many different reconstruction algorithms, most can be sub-classified into two main categories; filtered back-projection (FBP) and algebraic iterative algorithms (Flores et al, 2013). FBP methods are based on analytical algorithms using the inverse Fourier transform on equally spaced projections (Flores et al, 2013) while algebraic iterative methods fit predictor models to data through iterations (Deá k et al, 2013) and do not require evenly spaced projections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cost per iteration increases quadratically with the size and number of input sinograms, and the slow convergence of the iterative approach requires many of those expensive iterations. There are some more efficient approaches that implement algebraic methods by using graphic processing units (GPUs) [14,15]. In addition, the number of the iterations in the algebraic approaches is a tuning parameter, which typically determines how much detailed features are included in the resulting reconstruction; a too large choice would give a noisy reconstruction, and a too small choice would not give a reconstruction with many missing details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%