1983
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.140.2.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT diagnosis of an esophageal foreign body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we have shown the advantage of CT in the detection of fish bones in the oesophagus. The results obtained in the present investigation are also supported by previous studies (Gamba et al, 1983;Braverman et al, 1993;Nakabayashi et al, 1996). As mentioned previously by many authors, roentgenographic examination did not show the existence of fine fish bones clearly in many cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we have shown the advantage of CT in the detection of fish bones in the oesophagus. The results obtained in the present investigation are also supported by previous studies (Gamba et al, 1983;Braverman et al, 1993;Nakabayashi et al, 1996). As mentioned previously by many authors, roentgenographic examination did not show the existence of fine fish bones clearly in many cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Gamba et al (1983) reported a case of an oesophageal foreign body, a piece of rib bone present for about three years, which had escaped prior detection by plain chest radiography, barium swallow, and oesophagoscopy. In this case, the foreign body was finally detected by means of CT. Because of the greater contrast resolution of CT, calcified objects not seen on conventional radiographs can be found on CT scans (Gamba et al, 1983). CT image reconstruction also eliminates the superimposition of overlying structures that may obscure a foreign body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a significant false‐positive rate of 19% and, more important, a false‐negative‐rate of 55%. This compares unfavorably with CT in the detection of foreign bodies in particular fish bones 10‐12 . The role of CT for the treatment of the patient with a fish bone impacted in the cervical esophagus has been clearly demonstrated by our study and supported by previous reports 10 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This compares unfavorably with CT in the detection of foreign bodies in particular fish bones 10‐12 . The role of CT for the treatment of the patient with a fish bone impacted in the cervical esophagus has been clearly demonstrated by our study and supported by previous reports 10 . The CT scan provides the dual benefit of not only localizing the object, but also helping to ascertain the presence of any complications that may have arisen as a result of the impaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of false positive results in this study was 22%. (7,8,9) Studies have found that plain film is false negative in 30 to 55% of cases and false positive in 24% cases. 5(8%) cases showed indirect evidence of foreign bodies in digital X-ray in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%