2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3673-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CSR by Any Other Name? The Differential Impact of Substantive and Symbolic CSR Attributions on Employee Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
147
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
8
147
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Donia et al . () also suggest that this effect holds only if CSR is important to employees. Thus, identity‐based dynamics may be critical for understanding CSR attribution processes, as we discuss subsequently.…”
Section: Exchange‐related (Performing) Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Donia et al . () also suggest that this effect holds only if CSR is important to employees. Thus, identity‐based dynamics may be critical for understanding CSR attribution processes, as we discuss subsequently.…”
Section: Exchange‐related (Performing) Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Donia et al . () assert that perceptions of CSR activities as more self‐serving negatively influence employees’ sense of fit with the organization and their subsequent attitudes and behaviors, though only if CSR is important to employees. Evans et al .…”
Section: Combining Exchange‐/identity‐related (Performing/belonging) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this, several empirical studies have suggested that the use of symbolic CSR actions, decoupled from concrete change, positively affects a firm's legitimacy (e.g., Weaver, Trevino, & Cochran, 1999;Westphal & Zajac, 2001;Zott & Huy, 2007). However, although both substantive and symbolic CSR engagement may translate into being perceived as legitimate, further empirical research shows that substantive and symbolic CSR activities may differ with regard to their implications for stakeholder attributions and behavior (e.g., Donia, Ronen, Sirsly, & Bonaccio, 2017;Godfrey et al, 2009;McShane & Cunningham, 2012;Vlachos, Panagopoulos, & Rapp, 2013).…”
Section: Substantive and Symbolic Management Of Corporate Social Respmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the context of CSR, the effectiveness of a firm's actions used to be perceived as socially responsible can depend on their nature. Previous research has highlighted that substantive and symbolic CSR activities do not necessarily affect stakeholder reactions similarly (e.g., Donia et al, 2017;Hawn & Ioannou, 2012). More specifically, in case of considerable violations of prior expectations, it does matter for stakeholders whether legitimacy was achieved by engaging mainly in symbolic rather than substantive CSR activities (Carlos & Lewis, 2018;Lyon & Maxwell, 2011;Zavyalova, Pfarrer, Reger, & Shapiro, 2012).…”
Section: Assimilation and Contrast Effects Subsequent To Csirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O presente estudo expande a discussão das consequências de uma responsabilidade social bem executada e estabelecida para outras culturas, como recomendado por diversos autores (e.g., DONIA et al, 2017;SHEN;ZHANG, 2019;TIAN;ROBERTSON, 2019). Os resultados obtidos também contribuem para a pesquisa de antecedentes da RSE, que podem ser indispensáveis influências nas percepções dos stakeholders sobre a RSE.…”
Section: Contribuiçõesunclassified