2015
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CSF tau correlates with CJD disease severity and cognitive decline

Abstract: The correlation between tau levels and the disease severity and degree of cognitive decline in patients with fCJD suggests that tau can be a biomarker reflecting the extent of neuronal damage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would also be in agreement with the reported correlation between CJD tau levels and the degree of cognitive impairment and disease severity as suggested recently in a study from Israel [28]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This would also be in agreement with the reported correlation between CJD tau levels and the degree of cognitive impairment and disease severity as suggested recently in a study from Israel [28]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Third, unlike measures of β-amyloid that are relatively selective for AD, markers of neuronal injury are sensitive to multiple conditions. Smaller HCV is for instance also a feature of hippocampal sclerosis (Jack et al, 2002), TDP-43 proteinopathy (Whitwell et al, 2010), and argyrophilic grain disease, whereas elevated CSF tau is seen in cerebrovascular disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (Cohen et al, 2016), and traumatic brain injury (Tsitsopoulos and Marklund, 2013). Another reason for lower concordance between neuronal injury markers could be the heterogeneity between p-tau 181 and p-tau 231 , as a recent study suggests that the latter is superior in identifying AD (Spiegel et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] , S100β [26] or neuronspecific enolase [27] have been evaluated to be supportable biomarkers for CJD, but we did not include those results because it was not yet become the routine test for CJD. An additional limitation is that this study was retrospective, being based on clinical chart records from a single center in Korea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%