2016
DOI: 10.1116/1.4965883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CSAR 62 as negative-tone resist for high-contrast e-beam lithography at temperatures between 4 K and room temperature

Abstract: The temperature dependence of the electron-beam sensitive resist CSAR 62 is investigated in its negative-tone regime. The writing temperatures span a wide range from 4 K to room temperature with the focus on the liquid helium temperature regime. The importance of low temperature studies is motivated by the application of CSAR 62 for deterministic nanophotonic device processing by means of in-situ electron-beam lithography. At low temperature, CSAR 62 exhibits a high contrast of 10.5 and a resolution of 49 nm. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the help of the numerical optimization of the microlens design, it is possible to achieve outcoupling efficiencies of almost 30% for an NA of 0.4. 31,41 For the fabrication of the QD-microlenses, a 80 nm thick electron-sensitive CSAR62 resist film 42 is first spin-coated onto the sample, and then a specially modified electron scanning microscope is used to record cathodoluminescence maps at T = 10 K. Suitable QDs are selected based on the emission wavelength and the emission intensity of the excitonic lines, and a lenticular dose profile is then introduced into the resist at the positions of selected QDs. In the later anisotropic, plasma-enhanced reactive ion etching step, the electron-sensitive resist remaining on the sample surface after exposure and development acts as an etching mask so that the introduced lens profile is transferred into the semiconductor material, resulting in the monolithic QD microlenses.…”
Section: Device Technology and Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help of the numerical optimization of the microlens design, it is possible to achieve outcoupling efficiencies of almost 30% for an NA of 0.4. 31,41 For the fabrication of the QD-microlenses, a 80 nm thick electron-sensitive CSAR62 resist film 42 is first spin-coated onto the sample, and then a specially modified electron scanning microscope is used to record cathodoluminescence maps at T = 10 K. Suitable QDs are selected based on the emission wavelength and the emission intensity of the excitonic lines, and a lenticular dose profile is then introduced into the resist at the positions of selected QDs. In the later anisotropic, plasma-enhanced reactive ion etching step, the electron-sensitive resist remaining on the sample surface after exposure and development acts as an etching mask so that the introduced lens profile is transferred into the semiconductor material, resulting in the monolithic QD microlenses.…”
Section: Device Technology and Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process includes low-temperature cathodoluminescence spectroscopy to identify suitable QDs in combination with 3D low-temperature EBL to write lens-shaped structures into AR-P 6200 (CSAR 62) as low-temperature electron-beam resist. 28 In the final step, the lens shapes are transferred into the 420 nm thick GaAs capping layer by inductively coupled plasma reactive-ion etching. A scanning-electron microscopy image of a microlens is shown in Figure 2 a.…”
Section: Device Design and Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a relatively high QD spatial density of a few times 10 9 /cm 2 ( Fig. 1 (a)) mesas of diameters in the range of (500 -2500) nm were fabricated deterministically over the selected QDs with respect to the brightness and spectral range, to assure that only a single QD is embedded within the mesa structure via the lowtemperature in-situ EBL approach [Kaganskiy (2015), , Gschrey (2013)] utilizing CSAR62 [Kaganskiy (2016)] electron-beam sensitive resist. As it has recently been proven theoretically, the main photon losses are related to the in-plane propagation [Schneider (2018)] which can be limited by forming even relatively simple disc-shaped mesa structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%