2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7307-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization kinetics of PCL and PCL–glass composites for additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of PCL, Δ E a is almost constant up to a X t of 30%, and then increases with the degree of crystallinity up to an X t of 80%, where the activation energy value attains a maximum value, and then decreases slightly as X t further increases. The Δ E a values for PCL crystallization were between −140 and −67 kJ mol −1 in the X t range from 10 to 90%, which are similar to those reported in the literature and obtained by the Friedman isoconversional method [33,34,35]. Δ E a value for PCL/APIBPOSS containing 2 and 5 wt % POSS increases monotonically with increasing the extent of the relative crystallization ( X t ), indicating that crystallization occurs much easier at lower relative crystallinity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the case of PCL, Δ E a is almost constant up to a X t of 30%, and then increases with the degree of crystallinity up to an X t of 80%, where the activation energy value attains a maximum value, and then decreases slightly as X t further increases. The Δ E a values for PCL crystallization were between −140 and −67 kJ mol −1 in the X t range from 10 to 90%, which are similar to those reported in the literature and obtained by the Friedman isoconversional method [33,34,35]. Δ E a value for PCL/APIBPOSS containing 2 and 5 wt % POSS increases monotonically with increasing the extent of the relative crystallization ( X t ), indicating that crystallization occurs much easier at lower relative crystallinity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It should be pointed out that the effective activation energy varies between −45 kJ/mol and −98 kJ/mol covering a wide range of energies. Published results concerning PCL showed a similar variation with a change from −49 kJ mol −1 to −110 kJ mol −1 with χt the ranging from 10 to 90% [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, besides having good thermal stability, semi-crystalline thermoplastics often possess considerably better mechanical properties, making them tougher and more deformable compared to amorphous glassy polymers [7,8]. Hence, FFF with semi-crystalline polymers has found its use in, for example, biomedical applications, including PEEK [9] and PA [10] for the production of customized implants, and PLA [11] and PCL [12,13] for scaffolds. Nonetheless, semi-crystalline polymers exhibit far greater shrinkage upon cooling in comparison with amorphous plastics due to the considerable volume reduction associated with the formation of ordered, more densely packed regions during crystallization [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%