2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystalline anisotropy and cation distribution in nanosized quasi-spherical ferroxide particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative areas (RA) of Fe on the different sites do not correspond fully to the standard values (50 : 16.6 : 16.6 : 8.3 : 8.3 [23]). A similar distribution has been also observed in powder samples of mono-domain barium hexaferrite powders produced by co-precipitation [22,24]. The bipyramidal (2b) sites are not fully occupied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The relative areas (RA) of Fe on the different sites do not correspond fully to the standard values (50 : 16.6 : 16.6 : 8.3 : 8.3 [23]). A similar distribution has been also observed in powder samples of mono-domain barium hexaferrite powders produced by co-precipitation [22,24]. The bipyramidal (2b) sites are not fully occupied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It can be seen that all the characteristic peaks of the three samples are well-coincided with respect to the standard peaks. There is no other undesired diffraction maximums of the impurities that can be observed from the spectra and the asproduced magnetite samples are found to exist in inverse cubic spinel structure [41]. Interestingly, it is noted that the spectrum for sample SCM2 (silica coated magnetic nanoclusters with pre-determined reaction parameters) consisted of amorphous structure in between the range of 208 and 308 2u region which is attributed to the amorphous silica matrix, as being clearly indicated in Fig.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Maity and Agrawal, however, report that the aggregation of the Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles is essentially due to magnetostatic interaction as a result of the dipole-dipole interaction [10]. [21]. The result also reveals the superparamagnetic behaviour of the produced Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles due to its relatively low remanence magnetization and the coercivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%