Objective estimation of the error (o'Fmeas) in each structure factor (Fracas), by a procedure such as that outlined in Acta Cryst. (1964) 17, 1327, allows the indicator qle =-[z~ (A2Fmeas/a2Fmeas) + Z~_n,J 1:2 to be evaluated, where dF~e,~ = IFme~l -IFcald, Zm--n,~" 2 is given by the x 2 distribution at the e-significance level, and the model for which ZA2Fm~a~ is minimized contains m independent F~as and n variables. The sensitivity of ~'~ to errors in Fmeas is examined under both real and hypothetical conditions. For the real case, the range in ~0.01 for eight recently measured inorganic crystals indicates the average minimum residual error in aFmeas to be about 1%, the maximum error to be about 21%. The hypothetical case is considered by propagating several types of error into a set of 772 independent Frneas corresponding to a model consisting of 10 independent atoms undergoing isotropic thermal vibration. The indicator q:0.01 detects a systematic intensity error at a level in which the maximum intensity error in 97% of the data reaches 5%. Long term drift in the experiment is indicated with considerable sensitivity by ~'0.01. Systematic error as a function of scattering angle is detectable only if the aFmeas contain a component due to the suspected error.