Proceedings of the nanoGe Fall Meeting19 2019
DOI: 10.29363/nanoge.nfm.2019.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal Orientation and Grain Size: Do They Matter for Optoelectronic Properties of MAPbI3 Perovskite?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Besides the efficiency benchmarking, there have also been advances in understanding the chemistry, physics, and device chemical physics of these cells both from a theoretical and experimental side. 7−17 The grain-scale microstructure of perovskite thin films has also been studied 18 and optimized, with particular attention on increasing the average grain size 19,20 but with little focus on the influence of the distribution of sizes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Besides the efficiency benchmarking, there have also been advances in understanding the chemistry, physics, and device chemical physics of these cells both from a theoretical and experimental side. 7−17 The grain-scale microstructure of perovskite thin films has also been studied 18 and optimized, with particular attention on increasing the average grain size 19,20 but with little focus on the influence of the distribution of sizes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 In other cases, single crystal grains protrude throughout the entire film's thickness, and hence, grain boundaries would only be present at the vertical surfaces separating the grains. 21 Moreover, some reports claim that the grain boundaries and hence the grain size are not important, 19 and others show that there is an advantage to larger grains. 21,23,24 In our discussion, we will refer to vertical grain surfaces as grain boundaries and to horizontal ones as interfaces (see Figure 1b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that the grain and grain boundary behaves very differently in solution-fabricated perovskite solar cells (PSCs). 18 However, recent reports identified that these "grains" observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) without diffraction information might consist of subgrains with different crystal orientations identified by electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD), 19 which are technically inaccurate to be termed as "grains" in the crystallographic definition. In this context, the term "morphological domain" specifically refers to the "domain" identified as "grain" in the SEM measurement in previous investigations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also visible variation in crystal orientation and grain sizes due to these processing heterogeneities which directly affect several optical parameters such as absorption profiles. 52 However, for accurate results in modeling polycrystalline films, it is crucial to factor in the film thickness when evaluating the absorption properties or quantum efficiencies of the device using electrical simulations, since it directly relates to the complex refractive index, N, where N = n ± ik, with n and k being the index of refraction and extinction coefficient, respectively. For instance, 300−500 μm of MAPbI 3 film has been found to be optimum as the absorber layer in accordance with typical diffusion lengths and penetration depths.…”
Section: Device Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%