The interfacial electron transfer (IET) dynamics of single CdSe core/multilayer shell (CdS 2ML ZnCdS 1ML ZnS 1ML ) quantum dots (QDs) on the (110) surface of a rutile TiO 2 single crystal and TiO 2 nanoparticles have been compared. The fluorescence decay rates of single QDs on TiO 2 are faster than those on glass, an insulating substrate, due to IET from the QDs to TiO 2 . Whereas the average IET rates are similar for QDs on the single crystal and nanoparticles, the distribution of IET rates is much broader in the latter, indicating a broad distribution of QD adsorption sites on the TiO 2 nanoparticles.
interfacial electron transfer, single quantum dots, TiO 2 single crystalUnderstanding interfacial electron transfer (IET) dynamics to and from quantum dots (QDs) is essential to the improvement of QD based solar cells [117]. Previous studies of IET from molecules and QDs to TiO 2 nanoparticles have revealed highly heterogeneous IET dynamics [2, 1828]. For QDs on TiO 2 and other oxide nanoparticles, the heterogeneity can be caused by distributions of a number of properties of the oxide (exposed surfaces, defects, adsorption sites) and QDs (size, shape, and charge) as well as their interactions. Their complexities hinder a detailed understanding of important factors that control the IET rate and its distributions. It is therefore desirable to investigate these IET processes in well characterized oxide single crystal surfaces, where the properties of the oxides can be better controlled. Unfortunately, IET in these model systems cannot be readily examined by ensemble average techniques, such as the widely used transient absorption spectroscopy. Herein, we report a study of IET of single QDs on the (110) surface of a rutile TiO 2 single crystal. We show that the average IET rate on the (110) surface of the single crystal is similar to that on TiO 2 nanoparticles, but the IET rate distribution on the single crystal is much narrower. The single QD spectroscopic method not only enables the investigation of IET on the single crystal surface, but also reveals the underlying heterogeneous distribution of IET rates.QDs used for this study (from Ocean NanoTech, LLC USA) consist of a CdSe core, a multilayer shell of CdS 2ML ZnCdS 1ML ZnS 1ML . The QDs are capped with octadecylamine and an ultrathin carboxylic functionalized polymer [29], which is used to bind the QD to the oxide surface. The lowest energy exciton absorption and emission peaks of these QDs are at 580 and 600 nm, respectively, as shown in Figure S1. TiO 2 colloidal nanoparticles and thin films were prepared by following previously reported methods [30]. A rutile TiO 2 single crystal cut in the (110) direction (10 × 10 mm in area and 1.0 mm thick) was purchased from MTI Corporation. Prior to preparing samples for IET studies, the single-crystal was first cleaned by Nochromix sulfuric acid solution, washed by water (Millipore, 18.2 M·cm), and illuminated by UV light for about 1 h [31,32].The adsorption of QDs on the TiO 2 single crystal was studied by atomic for...