Cryptanalysis and improvement on a new RFID mutual authentication protocol compatible with EPC standard

Practical Attacks on a RFID Authentication Protocol Conforming to EPC C-1 G-2 Standard

“…Many RFID authentication protocols have been proposed until now [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Although mentioned protocols have wanted to provide secure and untraceable communication for RFID systems; many weaknesses have been found in them [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38].However, Yeh et al [1] have recently proposed a RFID mutual authentication protocol compatible with EPC C-1 G-2 standard that we name SRP (Securing RFID Protocol) in this paper. The authors have claimed that not only does not reveal SRP any information but also it has forward secrecy characteristic.…”

Cryptanalysisof two mutual authentication protocols for low-cost RFID

“…• Desynchronization: This is an active attack in which a malicious adversary tries to cause the tag and the reader to update inconsistent values and make tag disabled [11]. In recent years, many researchers have tried to propose lightweight and secure authentication protocols [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], but unfortunately many vulnerabilities have been found in their schemes [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Recently Fu et al [39] proposed a scalable RFID mutual authentication and Li et al [40] suggested a mutual authentication protocol for RFID communication.…”