2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification versus conventional rapid freezing: Effects on motility, viability, morphology and cellular defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study by Le et al [34], morphology in spermatozoa was better preserved after devitrification with less defects observed when compared to conventional freezing. In our study, morphological changes in spermatozoa increased during vitrification and storage at the cost of intact acrosomes and sperm tails.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In a study by Le et al [34], morphology in spermatozoa was better preserved after devitrification with less defects observed when compared to conventional freezing. In our study, morphological changes in spermatozoa increased during vitrification and storage at the cost of intact acrosomes and sperm tails.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Pabon et al warmed vitrified human spermatozoa micropills (5-10 μl each) in 500 μl medium prewarmed and maintained at 44°C for 5 s and observed descent postthaw motility and mitochondrial activity [33]. Another report noted above warmed vitrified human sperm samples (30 μl pellets) in a 37°C water bath for 5 min resulting in motile and fertile sperm [32], indicating the flexibility of warming procedure.…”
Section: Vitrified Specimen Warmingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With 33 human semen samples, an experiment-controlled study found both slow cryopreservation and vitrification had similar results, but the latter was faster, easier and associated with lower toxicity and cost [28]. Le et al recently carried out a direct comparison between vitrification and slow cryopreservation [32]. They used 105 human fresh semen samples, exclusive of cryptozoospermia and azoospermia, divided them into washed and unwashed halves, and each group was split into two aliquots: one group cryopreserved by conventional freezing while the other by vitrification.…”
Section: Is Vitrification Superior To Conventional Freezing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technique has already been widely explored and found its uses on embryos and oocytes and lately also for spermatozoa. [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Different studies have described individual protocols using different carriers and methods for standardization of the vitrification procedure.…”
Section: Techniques With Modified Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%