2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreservation of caprine ovarian tissue using dimethylsulphoxide and propanediol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
2
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
32
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar changes were reported following exposure of ovarian tissue of sheep [19] and goats [2,3] to 1.5 M concentrations of the same cryoprotectants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar changes were reported following exposure of ovarian tissue of sheep [19] and goats [2,3] to 1.5 M concentrations of the same cryoprotectants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…animals, including sheep [1], goats [2,3], primates [4], rodents [5], and humans [6]. Satisfactory results have been reported, especially when a 1.5 M concentration was used in slow-freezing protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luna & Munhoz (2008) successfully vitrified bovine ovarian tissue fragments, using dimethylsulfoxide (2.6 M). In caprine preantral follicles cryopreserved with dimethylsulfoxide, remained good conditions the granulosa and nucleus cells (Rodrigues et al 2004). Castro et al (2011) used dimethylsulfoxide as intracellular cryoprotectant agent and demonstrated its effectiveness in preserving caprine ovarian tissue.…”
Section: Experiments Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the preservation protocols for ovarian tissue have been performed in presence of permeable cryoprotective substances such as glycerol (GLY), ethylene glycol (EG), propanediol (PROH) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), in concentrations ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 M. Besides their cryoprotective effect, these substances can also be toxic to cells, mainly during exposure period (Rodrigues et al, 2004a, Rodrigues et al, 2004band Santos et al, 2007b. Therefore, attention must be given to ovary transport before cryopreservation procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of histology alone is insufficient to assess the freezing-thawing process as morphological analysis, and is often not correlated to the viability or developmental competence of the follicles (Santos et al, 2006a andSantos et al, 2007a). Transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) is an important tool to assess the cell quality after freezing-thawing, because cryopreservation often induces loss of cell contents (Rodrigues et al, 2004a) and loss of mitochondrial activity (Santos et al, 2006b). In studies using ovine embryos as model, Cocero et al (2002) showed damage in organelles, at the ultra-structural level, from apparently normal cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%