2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryoablation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Renal Masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recently published comparative study revealed that cryoablation of renal tumors results in similar outcomes compared with RF ablation. 4 Although these results need to be substantiated with randomized studies, many interventional radiologists prefer cryoablation over RF ablation for several reasons. These include less procedural pain and thus decreased anesthesia use, and real-time visualization of the ablation zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently published comparative study revealed that cryoablation of renal tumors results in similar outcomes compared with RF ablation. 4 Although these results need to be substantiated with randomized studies, many interventional radiologists prefer cryoablation over RF ablation for several reasons. These include less procedural pain and thus decreased anesthesia use, and real-time visualization of the ablation zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biopsy is not performed in some percutaneous series [49]. Surgeons likely have a more aggressive approach to treating renal cancer and perform every ablation under the assumption that the lesion is cancerous.…”
Section: Intent To Treat: Does the Approach Matter?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For space-occupying lesions <4 cm, Georgiades et al achieved a success rate of 100% one year after ablation (36). Over a follow-up period of 3 years, Pirasteh et al demonstrated lasting treatment success in 93% of patients (37). Atwell et al reported similarly promising results for the treatment of 145 small renal tumors <3 cm (38).…”
Section: Cryoablationmentioning
confidence: 99%