1979
DOI: 10.1139/e79-144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure of the central Sverdrup Basin

Abstract: A synthesis of refraction data recorded in 1972 and 1973 in the central Sverdrup Basin with other geophysical data shows major features which correlate well with the regional geological structure. The record sections from the Arctic Archipelago show little coherent secondary energy compared with those from other areas of Canada. Normalization of the sections to remove effects of varying shot size and instrument gain has revealed a significant loss of amplitude and coherence of the upper and mid-crustal phases … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation between these ten sub-parallel subsurface tectonic structures is approximately 50 km, similar to undulating Moho topography recognised on regional seismic refraction results acquired within the region west of Amund Ringnes Island (Forsyth et al, 1979). Almost all of them are previously unknown or unrecognised.…”
Section: Gravity Anomalies and Geologysupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The separation between these ten sub-parallel subsurface tectonic structures is approximately 50 km, similar to undulating Moho topography recognised on regional seismic refraction results acquired within the region west of Amund Ringnes Island (Forsyth et al, 1979). Almost all of them are previously unknown or unrecognised.…”
Section: Gravity Anomalies and Geologysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Two of the anticlinal structures delineated coincide with the actual positions of the well-known, large-scale Eurekan structural elements: the Princess Margaret Arch (PMA) and Cornwall Arch (CA). The PMA and CA were interpreted from regional seismic refraction studies by Forsyth et al (1979) and from regional gravity data analysis by and to be due to crustal warping or folding.…”
Section: Gravity Anomalies and Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GustafLougheed arch appears as a significant Bouguer gravity anomaly (Forsyth et al, 1979) and is characterized by both swarm activity and larger single events. The western Arctic region is similar to the eastern Arctic in terms of station density and azimuthal range covered.…”
Section: Western High Arcticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geologically, this is a region of deep (3-12 km) sediments (Sweeney et al 1978) resulting in a greater depth to basement which may account for the lack of shorter wavelength anomalies in the aeromagnetic data (Riddihough et al 1973). The eastward extension of this magnetic low is over the Sverdrup basin, where refraction data (Sander and Overton 1965;Overton 1970;Forsyth et al 1979) Thus, the magnetite Curie isotherm is well up into a thickly sedimented crust in this region which could account for the relative negative magnetic anomaly. Comparison of Fig.…”
Section: Fig 7 Reduction Of Pogo Anomaly Map To An Altitude Of 500 mentioning
confidence: 94%