2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geological features of the northeastern Canadian Arctic margin revealed from analysis of potential field data

Abstract: The northeastern Canadian Arctic margin is bordered to the north by Alpha Ridge, a dominantly magmatic complex within the Amerasia Basin of the Arctic Ocean, which forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the Paleocene age group indicates a rapid exhumation pulse at a rate of ≥0.4 km/Myr prior to sediment deposition. We interpret this rapid exhumation as reflecting a generally extensional period related to crustal thinning and tectonic denudation rather than tectonic uplift, because (i) it is coeval with basin formation and deposition in a coastal marine environment (as indicated by the palynology data) and, thus, with subsidence of parts of the continental margin, and (ii) it coincides with a period of crustal extension from Late Cretaceous‐Cenozoic times proposed by interpretation of aeromagnetic and gravity data for the northeastern Canadian Arctic margin (Anudu et al, ) and also predicted between 63 and 55 Ma by GPlates modeling (Gion et al, ; Harrison, ). Crustal thinning may have caused transtensional reactivation of preexisting fault zones, locally leading to pull‐apart(?)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the Paleocene age group indicates a rapid exhumation pulse at a rate of ≥0.4 km/Myr prior to sediment deposition. We interpret this rapid exhumation as reflecting a generally extensional period related to crustal thinning and tectonic denudation rather than tectonic uplift, because (i) it is coeval with basin formation and deposition in a coastal marine environment (as indicated by the palynology data) and, thus, with subsidence of parts of the continental margin, and (ii) it coincides with a period of crustal extension from Late Cretaceous‐Cenozoic times proposed by interpretation of aeromagnetic and gravity data for the northeastern Canadian Arctic margin (Anudu et al, ) and also predicted between 63 and 55 Ma by GPlates modeling (Gion et al, ; Harrison, ). Crustal thinning may have caused transtensional reactivation of preexisting fault zones, locally leading to pull‐apart(?)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Assuming geothermal gradients between 20 and 40 °C/km, average denudation rates for the lag time can be estimated between 0.85 and 0.25 km/Myr. Since denudation was presumably related to crustal extension/transtension (Harrison, ; Anudu et al, ; Gion et al, ; see also discussion on the pre‐Eurekan evolution), we consider a higher geothermal gradient to be more realistic and thus estimate denudation rates of ~0.45 to 0.25 km/Myr for the Paleocene, pre‐Eurekan stage, that is, for the time between isotopic closure (~63 Ma) and sediment deposition (~56 Ma). The increasing lag time and decreasing cooling rates from early to late Paleocene argue for an episodic high exhumation pulse during the Early Paleocene.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations