Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-011-9227-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure of Northwest Zagros (Kermanshah) and Central Iran (Yazd and Isfahan) using teleseismic Ps converted phases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(28 reference statements)
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This depth correlates well with that obtained from our SRFs beneath the CD zone (see Fig. 7) and is compatible with those derived from previous studies (Paul et al 2006, Afsari et al 2011, Shad Manaman et al 2011. SRFs showed the Moho at 50 km depth beneath the UDMA (see Fig.…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This depth correlates well with that obtained from our SRFs beneath the CD zone (see Fig. 7) and is compatible with those derived from previous studies (Paul et al 2006, Afsari et al 2011, Shad Manaman et al 2011. SRFs showed the Moho at 50 km depth beneath the UDMA (see Fig.…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…(2006Paul et el. ( , 2010 and Afsari et al (2011) using P receiver functions. Beneath the ZFTB, the crust is 50 km thick (Fig.s 5b & 6b).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moho depths range from 44 to 55 km, with slightly thicker average values in the northwestern Zagros (∼50 km) than in the southeastern Zagros (∼46 km). Although our estimates of crustal thickness are averaged over ∼100‐km length scales, they broadly agree with the local crustal thickness estimates of 42–58 km determined from receiver function studies (Afsari et al, ; Hatzfeld et al, ; Paul et al, ; Tatar & Nasrabadi, ).…”
Section: Calibrated Earthquake Locationssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The a k 135 velocity model (shown with dashed line) is used for all noncrustal phases at distances >17° (Kennett et al, ). Estimates for the thickness of the basement is taken from McQuarrie (), Molinaro et al (), Mouthereau et al (), Oveisi et al (), Allen et al (), Blanc et al (), Sherkati et al (), Abdollahie‐Fard et al (), and Casciello et al (), and for the thickness of the crust from Hatzfeld et al (), Afsari et al () and Tatar and Nasrabadi ().…”
Section: Calibrated Earthquake Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%