1991
DOI: 10.1029/90jb02316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure of accreted terranes in southern Alaska, Chugach Mountains and Copper River Basin, from seismic refraction results

Abstract: Seismic refraction data were collected along a 320‐km‐long “Transect” line in southern Alaska, crossing the Prince William, Chugach, Peninsular, and Wrangellia terranes, and along several shorter lines within individual terranes. Velocity structure in the upper crust (less than 9‐km depth) differs among the four terranes. In contrast, layers in the middle crust (9‐ to 25‐km depth) in some cases extend across projected terrane boundaries. The following observations can be made: (1) An intermediate‐velocity laye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
61
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the hypocentral distribution [Doser et al, 1999], they proposed that the downdip limit of the locked zone extends to a depth of 25 -30 km. This extent of the downdip limit is in agreement with the depth of the top of the slab determined from wide-angle seismic survey [Brocher et al, 1994;Fuis et al, 1991]. The crustal model of Brocher et al [1994] shows the updip limit of the coseismic rupture zone is also not shallower than the crustal block with velocities of >5.5 km/s.…”
Section: Comparison Of Subduction Seismogenic Zones With Great Interpsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…On the basis of the hypocentral distribution [Doser et al, 1999], they proposed that the downdip limit of the locked zone extends to a depth of 25 -30 km. This extent of the downdip limit is in agreement with the depth of the top of the slab determined from wide-angle seismic survey [Brocher et al, 1994;Fuis et al, 1991]. The crustal model of Brocher et al [1994] shows the updip limit of the coseismic rupture zone is also not shallower than the crustal block with velocities of >5.5 km/s.…”
Section: Comparison Of Subduction Seismogenic Zones With Great Interpsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…One implication of the stalled-slab model is that as the Mendocino triple junction moved northward, Gorda oceanic crust would have broken off from the Gorda plate and have become tectonically ac creted to the base of North America. In southern Alaska, there is seismic reflection and refraction evidence that the continental crust has indeed grown by the tectonic emplacement of oceanic crust (Fisher et al, 1989;Fuis et al, 1991;Brocher et al, 1994a). Our view of the models presented by Beaudoin et al (1998) for a seismic line across the landward projection of the Mendo cino Iracture zone is that the Gorda slab is being tectonically emplaced onto the base of North America.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, the Contact fault system within western PWS is composed of subparallel thrust faults that are accommodating postaccretion deformation [e.g., Dumoulin, 1987;Bol and Gibbons, 1992;Plafker et al, 1994]. Fuis et al [1991] showed north-dipping reflectors that project to the surface near the Contact fault system along the land-based TACT profile immediately north of PWS, and EberhartPhillips et al [2006] showed that the Contact fault system can be characterized by a north-dipping low-velocity zone. The Bainbridge fault extends beneath western PWS along a northeast-trending bathymetric lineament that separates the deepest waters of PWS from adjacent islands, with a seafloor elevation change of nearly 1 km.…”
Section: Bainbridge Fault and Contact Fault Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%