1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1951(96)00115-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal evolution of the Middle Urals based on seismic reflection and refraction data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is crustal subduction in the continent-continent suture instead of whole mantle lithosphere subduction in the oceanic subduction zones. Actually, similar dipping interfaces are found in the crust of many continental collision zones (Pliffner et al, 1988;Choukrome and ECORS Team, 1989;Sorkhabi and Stump, 1993;Juhlin et al, 1996;Yang, 2000). Although fluids or shear zones are also possible explanations, crustal subduction seems the most reasonable cause for the dipping structure in the collision areas.…”
Section: Multiple Crustal Subductionssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, it is crustal subduction in the continent-continent suture instead of whole mantle lithosphere subduction in the oceanic subduction zones. Actually, similar dipping interfaces are found in the crust of many continental collision zones (Pliffner et al, 1988;Choukrome and ECORS Team, 1989;Sorkhabi and Stump, 1993;Juhlin et al, 1996;Yang, 2000). Although fluids or shear zones are also possible explanations, crustal subduction seems the most reasonable cause for the dipping structure in the collision areas.…”
Section: Multiple Crustal Subductionssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Earlier geophysical investigations of the Southern Uralides indicated that a pronounced crustal root (10-15 km thick) underlies the orogen [Druzhinin et aI., 1988[Druzhinin et aI., , 1990Thouvenot et aI., 1995;Berzin et aI., 1996;Carbonell et at, 1996;Echtler et aI., 1996;Juhlin et al, 1996;Knapp et al, 1996]. The presence of a Uralian crustal root has long been a subject of controversy since the crust appears to be much thicker than required for the compensation of the subdued topography [Kruise and McNutt, 1988;Doring and GOtze, 1999].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near the crust-mantle boundary, the lower crust is composed of granulite, gabbro, pyroxenite and amphibole-rich rocks (Egorova et al 2006;Harley 1989;Roach 2004;Rudnick and Gao 2003), and the upper mantle consists of harzburgite, wehrlite, dunite, and lherzolite (Egorova et al 2006;Roach 2004;Sano and Kimura 2007). The transition from the lower crust to the upper mantle is usually recognized as a thin crust-mantle transition zone (CMTZ) (Durrheim and Green 1992;Finlayson et al 1993;Juhlin et al 1996;Meissner 1973), with a varied thickness (Durrheim and Green 1992;Nedimovic et al 2005;Niu and James 2002). Geophysically, the CMTZ is characterized by a jump of P-wave velocity (V p ) from *7.0 to *8.0 km/s and density from *3.0 to 3.3 g/ cm 3 (Durrheim and Green 1992;Griffin et al 1984;Meissner 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%