2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.110.011101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal Entrainment and Pulsar Glitches

Abstract: Large pulsar frequency glitches are generally interpreted as sudden transfers of angular momentum between the neutron superfluid permeating the inner crust and the rest of the star. Despite the absence of viscous drag, the neutron superfluid is strongly coupled to the crust due to nondissipative entrainment effects. These effects are shown to severely limit the maximum amount of angular momentum that can possibly be transferred during glitches. In particular, it is found that the glitches observed in the Vela … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
262
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
16
262
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally the forces that we calculate can be used to generate realistic pinning profiles for glitch models (Haskell, Pizzochero & Sidery 2013;Haskell & Antonopoulou 2013), simulations of vortex dynamics in neutron stars (Warszawski & Melatos 2008) or mode calculations (Glampedakis & Andersson 2009;Link 2012). Future work will aim to include consistently the effect of strong crustal entrainment, as Link (2014) has shown that including entrainment phenomenologically by rescaling the free neutron density can have important consequences for vortex creep, and more generally strong entrainment provides strong constraints for glitch models (Andersson et al 2012;Chamel 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More generally the forces that we calculate can be used to generate realistic pinning profiles for glitch models (Haskell, Pizzochero & Sidery 2013;Haskell & Antonopoulou 2013), simulations of vortex dynamics in neutron stars (Warszawski & Melatos 2008) or mode calculations (Glampedakis & Andersson 2009;Link 2012). Future work will aim to include consistently the effect of strong crustal entrainment, as Link (2014) has shown that including entrainment phenomenologically by rescaling the free neutron density can have important consequences for vortex creep, and more generally strong entrainment provides strong constraints for glitch models (Andersson et al 2012;Chamel 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more detailed study of the dependence of the snowplow model on parameters such as the equation of state and the mass of the star can be found in Seveso et al (2012) and Haskell, Pizzochero & Seveso (2013). Effects of superfluid entrainment will also be considered in future work, as strong entrainment in the crust can severely limit the amount of angular momentum that is exchanged during a glitch and allow to set constraints on the equation of state (Andersson et al 2012;Chamel 2013).…”
Section: Application To Pulsar Glitchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[51], the authors estimated that the observed glitches of Vela would be explained if 1.4% of the total momentum of inertia of the star resides in the crust. More recently, it was shown that crustal entrainment requires, in fact, a larger angular-momentum reservoir in the crust [52] associated with a fraction of the total momentum of inertia larger than that the crust may contain. Possible solutions to solve this problem include the contribution of the core to the glitch mechanism [53], or the choice of an appropriate EoS that predicts a sufficiently large pressure at the crust-core transition [54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent calculations of the strength of the entrainment of superfluid neutrons by the crustal lattice via Bragg scattering suggest that only a fraction of the crustal neutrons are effectively free, and consequently the upper limit to the moment of inertia of the angular momentum reservoir is reduced: ∆I ∼ 0.2I csf . Initial analyses suggested that makes ∆I/I too small to explain the observed glitch sizes (Chamel 2013(Chamel , 2012Andersson et al 2012), and suggests one must at least involve other components of the star in addition to the crust superfluid as the store of angular momentum. These studies assume a strong coupling between crust and core so that I ∼ Itot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%