2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal deformation and surface kinematics after the 2010 earthquakes in Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our velocity field is consistent with others obtained in previous studies [3,15,20]. We compared our velocities with those obtained by [15] in the seven common stations of both studies, obtaining differences inferior to 1.4 mm/yr of average for the horizontal component.…”
Section: Velocity Fieldsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our velocity field is consistent with others obtained in previous studies [3,15,20]. We compared our velocities with those obtained by [15] in the seven common stations of both studies, obtaining differences inferior to 1.4 mm/yr of average for the horizontal component.…”
Section: Velocity Fieldsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Comparing our model using the KRIGING geostatistical technique and the VEMOS2015 model, obtained from the SIRGAS multi-year solution SIR15P01 [20], we found diferencies than not exceed 2 mm/yr on the horizontal component ( Table 4). The greatest differences are found in the stations located in the central zone of Ecuador (Andes), which is the deformation zone between North Andean Block and Southamerica plate.…”
Section: Velocity Modelmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The continental continuous crustal deformation (displacement) model for Latin America (VEMOS2015 model with spatial resolution of 1° × 1°; Sánchez & Drewes, ) inferred from GNSS (GPS + GLONASS) measurements gained after the 2010 Maule megathrust earthquake, indicates how the effect of the Maule earthquake changed the surface kinematics of a large continental area (30–45°S), particularly in the Andean region. The model indicates that before the earthquake, the strain field showed a strong west‐east compression between 38 and 44°S (roughly parallel to the convergence vector) whose magnitudes diminish with distance from the subduction front.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study region lies in a transitional zone influenced by two overlapping tectonic loading conditions, associated with two, apparently independent, megathrust seismic cycles. As stated by Sánchez and Drewes (), regarding the 2010 Maule M w 8.8 earthquake post‐seismic effects, the region encompassed between 37 and 40°S would have undergone compressional surface deformation from March 2010 to April 2015, with the maximum horizontal stress trending N30°E (period of GNSS measurements). Conversely, the region south of 38°S has been undergoing interseismic reloading related to the locking of the 1960 Valdivia M w 9.5 earthquake rupture zone (Moreno et al, , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%