2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal deformation analysis across Garhwal Himalaya: Part of western Himalaya using GPS observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generated long time series of each station coordinates are corrected for outliers and velocities were estimated in the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) (Table 1 ). We also used the data from published works 14 , 33 , 53 56 along with our data. All the published data are converted to the ITRF 2008 reference frame and estimated the velocities in the Indian reference frame using the pole of rotation of Ader 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generated long time series of each station coordinates are corrected for outliers and velocities were estimated in the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) (Table 1 ). We also used the data from published works 14 , 33 , 53 56 along with our data. All the published data are converted to the ITRF 2008 reference frame and estimated the velocities in the Indian reference frame using the pole of rotation of Ader 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The published results of geodetic studies carried out by previous workers suggest building of a slip deficit between the HFT and the MBT over a width of about 100 km with a long‐term slip rate of 14 ± 1 mm/year (Banerjee & Bürgman, 2002; Bilham et al, 1997; Jouanne et al, 1999, 2004; Larson et al, 1999; Yadav et al, 2019). Similarly, accumulation of higher strain in the MCT zone and the inner part of the Lesser Himalayan region of Uttarakhand with a convergence rate of 15 mm/year has also been processed (Dumka et al, 2018; Jade et al, 2017; Mondal et al, 2016; Ponraj et al, 2011; Saji et al, 2020; Sharma et al, 2020; Yadav et al, 2020). The geodetic velocities of Mondal et al (2016) and Yadav et al (2020) are provided in (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, accumulation of higher strain in the MCT zone and the inner part of the Lesser Himalayan region of Uttarakhand with a convergence rate of 15 mm/year has also been processed (Dumka et al, 2018;Jade et al, 2017;Mondal et al, 2016;Ponraj et al, 2011;Saji et al, 2020;Sharma et al, 2020;Yadav et al, 2020). The geodetic velocities of Mondal et al (2016) and Yadav et al (2020) are provided in (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, these thrust faults in the Himalayas that accommodate the crustal shortening changed significantly (O'Kane et al, 2022). The Himalayan arc as a whole is seismically active, and recent geodetic studies based primarily on GPS measurements in the eastern, central, and western Himalayas found that the rate of convergence, strain accumulation, and deformation of the Indian Plate varies significantly in different segments, both parallel and orthogonal (Ader et al, 2012;Banerjee et al, 2008;Bisht et al, 2021;Dumka et al, 2014Dumka et al, , 2018Jade et al, 2014Jade et al, , 2017Jouanne et al, 2014Jouanne et al, , 2020Kundu et al, 2014;Sharma et al, 2021). The crustal shortening and convergence across the western Himalayas have been accommodated by several thrust and strike-slip faults such as Main Central Thrust (MCT), Panjal Thrust (PT), Main Boundary Thrust (MBT), Jhelum strike-slip Fault (JF), Kashmir Boundary Thrust (KBT), Riasi Thrust (RT), Nathia Gali Thrust (NT) and Salt Range Thrust (SRT) (M. R. Khan et al, 2016;Figure 1b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%