2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2011.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crust and upper mantle structure in central Brazil derived by receiver functions and SKS splitting analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing cratonic basins in North America and West Siberia, Armitage and Allen (2010) noted that the slow extension of relatively thick continental lithosphere causes permanent, long-lived thermal subsidence in cratonic basins. In fact, a 40 km thick crust, derived from receiver functions by Rosa et al (2012) and 3-D gravity inversion , occurs in the western part of the Parnaíba basin, where the sag deposits are thicker and the thermal subsidence lasted for a longer time (2BAC curve in Fig. 11).…”
Section: Subsidence Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing cratonic basins in North America and West Siberia, Armitage and Allen (2010) noted that the slow extension of relatively thick continental lithosphere causes permanent, long-lived thermal subsidence in cratonic basins. In fact, a 40 km thick crust, derived from receiver functions by Rosa et al (2012) and 3-D gravity inversion , occurs in the western part of the Parnaíba basin, where the sag deposits are thicker and the thermal subsidence lasted for a longer time (2BAC curve in Fig. 11).…”
Section: Subsidence Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compiled crustal thickness estimates from all recently published receiver function studies including stations in South America, especially those from the Brazilian Lithosphere Seismic Project (BLSP) in Brazil (Bianchi, 2008;Julià et al, 2008;Lloyd et al, 2010). Crustal thickness estimates from other stations in central and northern Brazil were also compiled from Krüger et al (2002), Rosa et al (2012), Albuquerque et al (2011) and unpublished monographs such as Pedreschi (1989) and Costa (2005). The compiled studies report both crustal thickness (H) and Vp/Vs ratio (k) estimated with different techniques, such as the Hek stacking procedure of Zhu and Kanamori (2000), the waveform matching technique of Meijde et al (2003) and Lloyd et al (2010), the phase- (2004) and Assumpção et al (2004), and the joint inversion of receiver functions and surface-wave dispersion velocities of Julià et al (2000Julià et al ( , 2003.…”
Section: Receiver Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SKS measurements are from Becker et al [2012] and updates of the Wüstefeld et al [2009] database, as of September 2014. Individual studies include the following: Abt et al [2010],Assumpção et al [2006Assumpção et al [ , 2011,Barruol et al [1997],Barruol and Hoffmann [1999],Bock et al [1998],Fontaine et al [2005],Growdon et al [2009], Heintz et al [2003,Helffrich et al [1994],Helffrich et al [2002],James and Assumpção [1996], Silver, 1992, Krüger et al [2002],Masy et al [2011],Meade et al [1995],Murdie and Russo [1999],Piñero-Feliciangeli and Kendall, 2008, Polet et al [2000],Rosa et al [2012],…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%