2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2012.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal thickness map of Brazil: Data compilation and main features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
65
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
13
65
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismic receiver functions suggest that the current crustal thickness of the Araçuaí-Ribeira belt is ∼ 32-41 km (Assumpção et al, 2013). Considering the pressure estimates obtained in this study and by Munhá et al (2005) for the minimum conditions for metamorphic peaks of the migmatitic kinzigites (650-700 MPa), we can infer that approximately 25 km of the continental crust thickness have been removed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Seismic receiver functions suggest that the current crustal thickness of the Araçuaí-Ribeira belt is ∼ 32-41 km (Assumpção et al, 2013). Considering the pressure estimates obtained in this study and by Munhá et al (2005) for the minimum conditions for metamorphic peaks of the migmatitic kinzigites (650-700 MPa), we can infer that approximately 25 km of the continental crust thickness have been removed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Gravimetric and seismic data show that the thickness of the continental crust in the area of the Parnaíba basin does not exceed 40 km (Assumpção et al 2013, Castro et al 2014 with Moho at shallow to intermediate depths in the northeast and central portions of the basin. The boreholes of the present study are located in this area (Fig.…”
Section: Geological Framework Of the Parnaíba Basinmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several isolated crustal thicknesses estimates available in the literature, obtained with different geophysical methods and data types, were superimposed to the 3-D Moho image (Figure 7). Those estimates come basically from seismic ( [40]- [43]) and gravimetric methods ( [44]). In general, we observe a good agreement between our 3-D Moho image and those estimates.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Image Of Mohorovičić Discontinuity In Nortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, CRUST2.0 global model does not show any relevant variation in Moho depth from one geological province to another and this result does not reflect the complex geological reality of the region ( [46]). Three-dimensional Moho image of the northeastern Brazil based on the methodology proposed in this study, and some isolated crustal thicknesses obtained via seismic (square-28 km [41]; triangle-40 km [40]; red numbers [42]; black numbers [43]) and gravimetric methods (white isolines [44]). Numbers close to the isolines are the corresponding crustal thicknesses.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Image Of Mohorovičić Discontinuity In Nortmentioning
confidence: 99%