Cruise Travels to the Arctic And Antarctica – Trends, Development and Prospects

Kizielewicz, Joanna

doi:10.18276/ept.2016.3.35-25

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unfortunately, to date, a universally applicable methodology for assessing this impact has not been established. This is primarily related to the fact that different types of indicators are used in research because of differences in the scope of collected data characterising tourist traffic, the type of tourist destination (Kizielewicz 2016), preference in the use of certain methods by entities carrying out research and entities which commission and pay for these studies (Dooms et al 2015). Some of the studies are industry-specific and concern a selected form of tourism such as cruise tourism (ClIA Europe 2013; Kizielewicz 2020).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of the maritime border on the development of Po- land’s border areas in terms of expenses of foreigners and the COVID-19 pandemic

Malkowska,

Malkowski,

Tokarz-Kocik

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to present the issue of border traffic of foreigners and their expenses on the Polish maritime border. The study is based on quantitative data on border traffic and expenses of foreigners in Poland. The time of the study was 2014–2021. Thus, the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on foreigners’ mobility and spending in Poland was additionally taken into account. For the purpose of this paper, the following study methods were adopted: reference literature analysis, secondary data analysis and comparative analysis. The paper mainly uses data from official statistics and the Border Guard. The study has shown that the Polish maritime border generates the smallest volume of border traffic, however, its share increased during the analysed period from 0.7% in 2014 to 0.8% in 2021. Nevertheless, it is foreigners crossing the maritime border who on average spend in Poland more than twice as much as foreigners crossing the Polish land border. In 2020, they spent the most on non-food goods (40%) and services (34.7%). As the study results reveal, their spending patterns and travel purposes are different from those of foreigners crossing the land border. The potential that foreign visitors bring is significant for the development of border areas in such sectors as tourism, services and trade. The analysis of the motivation of foreigners crossing the sea border makes it possible to shape the regional development policy of this particular area.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of the maritime border on the development of Po- land’s border areas in terms of expenses of foreigners and the COVID-19 pandemic

Malkowska,

Malkowski,

Tokarz-Kocik

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Certainly, while analysing the results of such studies we need to take into account the specificity of CTD and the function of cruise traveller performed in a particular destination. Kizielewicz (2016) defines four main roles played by a cruise traveller during cruise voyage, i.e., excursionist, cruise passenger, tourist, resident. The type of tourist destination has a significant impact on the role played by cruise travellers at a particular moment, which means that they purchase a different basket of goods and services in the home port, another in the port-of-call and yet another in the incoming port.…”

Section: Theory and Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The travellers' roles are determined by the functions performed by various tourist destinations, i.e. place of residence, home port (CTD Type I), port-of-call (CTD Type II) or incoming-port (CTD Type III), (Kizielewicz, 2016). In any of these tourist destinations travellers have different needs, which is reflected by their purchase.…”

Section: Economic Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In(exp)) (Table 3). *Phase I -Expenses for preparing for travel, Phase II -Travel expenses at home ports before a cruise travel, Phase III -Reception expenses at base ports, Phase IV -Expenses when travelling on cruise ships, Phase V -Expenditure on stays in coastal tourist destinations, Phase VI -Reception expenses at the home ports after a cruise travel, Phase VII -Expenditure on return travel to the place of residence, Phase VIII -Expenses for a summary of the trip Source: Own elaboration on the base of: (Kizielewicz, 2016;Jamie et al, 2017. ).…”

Section: Economic Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, a specific package of indicators can alco be used to determine the economic effects for this type of CTD Type III, such as T_CTD, TN_P, CTE_ CTD, CLE_CTD (Table 10). (Kizielewicz, 2016;PGA S.A., 2018); 8 million EUR = $8 754 400, 80 EUR = $87.54, Converter (EUR/USD) amounts to = 1.0943, on line: kalkulator-walutowy.mybank.pl/…”

Section: The Case Studies -Cruise Ports Playing Various Functionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Measuring the Economic and Social Contribution of Cruise Tourism Development to Coastal Tourist Destinations

Kizielewicz¹

2020

ERSJ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose:The main aim of this study is to identify the groups of indicators that can be applied to estimate the economic contribution of cruise ship tourism to the coastal tourist destinations. The research questions are as follows: 1) What are the areas where studies on the cruise ship tourism market in the world are conducted? 2) What entities on the cruising market are engaged in conducting such studies? 3) What entities are the beneficiaries of studies on the cruising market? 4) What type of quantitative and qualitative indicators are used in analysing the economic impact of the cruising market on social and economic development of coastal regions? 5) What groups of indicators used in studies on the cruising market may be interesting for the beneficiaries of these studies? Design/Methodology/Approach: The methods applied are literature review, exploration method of data, desk research method and comparative analysis. A model of a set of indicators dedicated to specific entities operating on cruise ship market and the list of quantitative and qualitative indicators, social subjective indicators, and indicators of interdependence is used. Findings: The analysis of reports regarding cruising market studies conducted in various regions worldwide proves that studies are performed based on various methodologies, at random, without any standardized research model, and therefore, it is difficult to conduct comparative analysis and assess the phenomena in a temporal perspective (dynamic analysis). The results indicate the wide scope of indicators that can be grouped in packages dedicated to individual entities involved in cruise ship market. Practical Implications: The modelling concept of the proposed economic indicators can be used in any configuration by the authorities of seaports, cruise ship-owners, suppliers of goods/services and local governments. Originality/Value: Traditional methodology of assessment of economic and social contribution of cruise market to the local and national economy refers to three basic measures, i.e., direct, indirect and induced impact. The study offers an in-depth insight into modelling of groups of indicators adopted to various entities.

show abstract

Cruise Travels to the Arctic And Antarctica – Trends, Development and Prospects

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

The impact of the maritime border on the development of Po- land’s border areas in terms of expenses of foreigners and the COVID-19 pandemic

The impact of the maritime border on the development of Po- land’s border areas in terms of expenses of foreigners and the COVID-19 pandemic

Measuring the Economic and Social Contribution of Cruise Tourism Development to Coastal Tourist Destinations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About