1992
DOI: 10.2514/3.25504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRRES magnetic electron spectrometer AFGL-701-5A (MEA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual current system configuration that can give rise to such strongly tail-like conditions as were observed near 5.5-6.5 MLT (see Figure 5) and 17. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].0 MLT (see Figure 2) is not clear, and its details require more observational constraints than are provided by a single satellite measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual current system configuration that can give rise to such strongly tail-like conditions as were observed near 5.5-6.5 MLT (see Figure 5) and 17. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].0 MLT (see Figure 2) is not clear, and its details require more observational constraints than are provided by a single satellite measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imprint of the coherent ULF wave can be seen globally throughout the electron radiation belt in the omni-directional flux from the SOPA instrument on two Los Alamos (LANL) geosynchronous satellites 19 , and differential flux from the MEA 20 (Medium Energy-A electron spectrometer) instrument on the CRRES 21 in-bound in the midnight-dusk local time sector ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Crres Observations and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an orbital period of ∼10 h, the CRRES satellite covered a range of L-shell from 1.05 to 8 and swept through the heart of the radiation belts every half orbit. The MEA instrument aboard the satellite measured pitch angle resolved electron differential fluxes in 17 energy channels, covering an energy range from 153 to 1582 keV [Vampola et al, 1992]. The low inclination of CRRES allowed the MEA instrument to observe the electron PADs with good positions near the equatorial region.…”
Section: Gu Et Al: Radiation Belt Energetic Electron Pad A01208 A01208mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a first-order polynomial fit can be applied to quantify the values of C and n. Since the flux observations, if small, could be contaminated or even dominated by the background noise, we set the flux Figure 5. Averaged n-values as a function of electron kinetic energy for six representative MLT sectors of 0000-0400, 0400-0800, 0800-1200, 1200-1600, 1600-2000, and 2000-2400 under different geomagnetic activity levels at the spatial location of L = 6.0 ± 0.1. threshold value as 10 0.5 cm −2 sec −1 sr −1 keV −1 [Vampola et al, 1992] and remove the measurements with values lower than it. To assure that sufficient flux versus pitch angle points are employed for reliable fitting, we further exclude the data with the number of useful points less than 3 for one energy channel.…”
Section: Gu Et Al: Radiation Belt Energetic Electron Pad A01208 A01208mentioning
confidence: 99%