2014
DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2014.11015519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crosswind Effect Studies on Road Vehicle Passing by Bridge Tower using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Abstract: When a road vehicle moving on a bridge deck is passing by a bridge tower, the vehicle will be shielded briefly from the crosswind by the bridge tower. This study aimed to apply computational fluid dynamics to explore this special engineering problem for the first time. A stationary vehicle immerged in the wake of a bridge tower was first simulated and compared with wind tunnel test results. By using the dynamic mesh method, the moving of the vehicle passing by a bridge tower was then simulated. The results sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean velocity of the incoming flow, U m , was 60 m/s, which was composed of the wind speed and train speed, and the yaw angle, β, was 15°, which is defined in Figure 2. The velocity inlet boundary has typically been used to simulate the incoming flow (García et al, 2015;Hemida & Krajnović, 2009b;Morden, Hemida, & Baker, 2015;Wang, Xu, Zhu, & Li, 2014) because it simplifies the method for defining its characteristics. The uniform (and constant in time) velocity profile of U m was used for the velocity inlet boundary.…”
Section: Computational Model and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean velocity of the incoming flow, U m , was 60 m/s, which was composed of the wind speed and train speed, and the yaw angle, β, was 15°, which is defined in Figure 2. The velocity inlet boundary has typically been used to simulate the incoming flow (García et al, 2015;Hemida & Krajnović, 2009b;Morden, Hemida, & Baker, 2015;Wang, Xu, Zhu, & Li, 2014) because it simplifies the method for defining its characteristics. The uniform (and constant in time) velocity profile of U m was used for the velocity inlet boundary.…”
Section: Computational Model and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the dynamic mesh and sliding mesh method are usually used to present the movement of the train in the simulation. Based on the dynamic technique, Wang, Xu, Zhu, and Li (2014) explored the crosswind effect on road vehicles passing by bridge tower and Liu, Chen, Zhou, and Zhang (2018) numerically made an aerodynamic analysis about a train traveling through a rectangular windbreak zone by means of the sliding mesh. Nevertheless, significant disadvantages of these methods are that for the very complex and irregular geometry model of the moving part, it is difficult to generate the solving mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, viaducts and bridges that are routinely exposed to crosswind CONTACT A. Alonso-Estébanez alonsoea@unican.es conditions can be the cause of both safety and economic issues. As a consequence, several studies have investigated the impact of crosswinds on bridges (Wang, Xu, Zhu, Cao, & Li, 2013;Wang, Xu, Zhu, & Li, 2014). Some studies have focused on the development of procedures to regulate traffic (Cheung & Chan, 2010;Guo & Xu, 2006), while other research has studied wind fence efficiency (Kozmar, Procino, Borsani, & Bartoli, 2012;Rocchi, Rosa, Sabbioni, Sbrosi, & Belloli, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vehicles suffer huge instabilities under crosswind conditions (Argentini, Ozkan, Rocchi, Rosa, & Zasso, 2011;Wang et al, 2014) at the towers on the bridges. In Charuvisit et al (2004) the effect of tower geometry on vehicle stability was studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation