1998
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.1.201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossing the Midline: A Study of Four-Year-Old Children

Abstract: Midline crossing refers to behavior that results in reaching, stepping, or looking, across the body's midline. Several studies have indicated that infants, young children, and individuals with disability make more errors on midline-crossing tasks than on similar tasks placed at the ipsilateral side. Until recently, assessment of midline crossing has used a spatial protocol and has been criticized for not having a temporal component. The purpose of this study was to assess midline crossing by 9 4-yr.-old childr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ability is very important when children learn to write. Such a strategy, however, is rare and very demanding for preschoolers (or even for some younger school-aged children) as it requires good eye-hand coordination and communication between two hemispheres (Bradshaw, Spataro, Harris, Nettleton, & Bradshaw, 1988;Carlier, Doyen, & Lamard, 2006;Cermak, Quintero, & Cohen, 1980;Gabbard, Helbig, & Gentry, 2001;Gleissner, Bekkering, & Meltzoff, 2000;Hausmann, Waldie, & Corballis, 2003;Leconte & Fagard, 2006;Screws, Eason, & Surburg, 1998;van Hof, van der Kamp, & Savelsbergh, 2002). Therefore, very young children mostly choose an easier solution: They use a hand which is ipsilateral to the side of the planned action (Carlier et al, 2006;Leconte & Fagard, 2006) or they move the action towards the side of the preferred hand (Hausmann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Bodily Reference Frames and Their Relation To Spatial Prefermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This ability is very important when children learn to write. Such a strategy, however, is rare and very demanding for preschoolers (or even for some younger school-aged children) as it requires good eye-hand coordination and communication between two hemispheres (Bradshaw, Spataro, Harris, Nettleton, & Bradshaw, 1988;Carlier, Doyen, & Lamard, 2006;Cermak, Quintero, & Cohen, 1980;Gabbard, Helbig, & Gentry, 2001;Gleissner, Bekkering, & Meltzoff, 2000;Hausmann, Waldie, & Corballis, 2003;Leconte & Fagard, 2006;Screws, Eason, & Surburg, 1998;van Hof, van der Kamp, & Savelsbergh, 2002). Therefore, very young children mostly choose an easier solution: They use a hand which is ipsilateral to the side of the planned action (Carlier et al, 2006;Leconte & Fagard, 2006) or they move the action towards the side of the preferred hand (Hausmann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Bodily Reference Frames and Their Relation To Spatial Prefermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Children were able to choose spontaneously which hand they would use for counting. Since preschoolers usually exhibit ipsilateral strategies in manual tasks (they perform an action on a side which is ipsilateral to a used hand; Bradshaw, Spataro, Harris, Nettleton & Bradshaw, ; Carlier, Doyen & Lamard, ; Gabbard, Helbig & Gentry, ; Gleissner, Bekkering & Meltzoff, ; Hausmann, Waldie & Corballis, ; Screws, Eason & Surburg, ; van Hof, van der Kamp & Savelsbergh, ), forcing them to count with one particular hand could distort their natural spatial counting preferences. Both the direction of counting and the hand used to solve the task were recorded by the experimenter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tasks like reaching or pointing, preschool children usually exhibit the effect of midline crossing inhibition (MCI): they prefer to reach for or place an object on the side ipsilateral to the used hand, or to do so with the hand Unauthenticated Download Date | 5/11/18 8:33 PM ipsilateral to the side of a planned action (Bradshaw, Spataro, Harris, Nettleton, & Bradshaw, 1988;Carlier, Doyen & Lamard, 2006;Gabbard, Helbig, & Gentry, 2001;Gleissner, Bekkering, & Meltzoff, 2000;Hausmann, Waldie, & Corballis, 2003;Leconte & Fagard, 2006;Screws, Eason, & Surburg, 1998;van Hof, van der Kamp, & Savelsbergh, 2002). This effect is age-specific and disappears in older children (Cermak, Quintero, & Cohen, 1980).…”
Section: How Manual Response Pattern May Be Related To Number-space Amentioning
confidence: 99%