2015
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to rapidly construct a spatial–numerical representation in preliterate children (at least temporarily)

Abstract: Spatial processing of numbers has emerged as one of the basic properties of humans' mathematical thinking. However, how and when number-space relations develop is a highly contested issue. One dominant view has been that a link between numbers and left/right spatial directions is constructed based on directional experience associated with reading and writing. However, some early forms of a number-space link have been observed in preschool children who cannot yet read and write. As literacy experience is eviden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One preliminary conclusion from these studies could be the availability of multiple spatial codes and a flexible attainment of those depending on task contexts, for instance in different associations of ordinalities and cardinalities with spatial directions (Patro, Nuerk, Cress, & Haman, 2014). Experimentally, this idea is supported by a reported visuo-motor directional training experience in preliterate children that modulated non-symbolic space-magnitude associations (a cardinal SNARC-like effect), but had no impact on ordinal counting directions (Patro, Fischer, Nuerk, & Cress, 2016). …”
Section: Implications For a Common Framework Of Mental Space Activationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One preliminary conclusion from these studies could be the availability of multiple spatial codes and a flexible attainment of those depending on task contexts, for instance in different associations of ordinalities and cardinalities with spatial directions (Patro, Nuerk, Cress, & Haman, 2014). Experimentally, this idea is supported by a reported visuo-motor directional training experience in preliterate children that modulated non-symbolic space-magnitude associations (a cardinal SNARC-like effect), but had no impact on ordinal counting directions (Patro, Fischer, Nuerk, & Cress, 2016). …”
Section: Implications For a Common Framework Of Mental Space Activationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A strong interaction between space encoding and number processing is suggested by brain imaging studies (Cutini, Scarpa, Scatturin, Dell'Acqua, & Zorzi, 2014;Göbel, Calabria, Farnè, & Rossetti, 2006;Goffaux, Martin, Dormal, Goebel, & Schiltz, 2012;Ranzini, Dehaene, Piazza, & Hubbard, 2009) and behavioural studies (Dehaene et al, 1993;Hoffmann, Mussolin, Martin, & Schiltz, 2014;Nuerk, Wood, & Willmes, 2005). In recent years, this interaction has also been investigated in young children, prior formal schooling (de Hevia & Spelke, 2009;Hoffmann, Hornung, Martin, & Schiltz, 2013;Patro, Fischer, Nuerk, & Cress, 2016;Patro & Haman, 2012;Patro, Nuerk, Cress, & Haman, 2014).…”
Section: Link Between Spatial Skills and Early Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although early predispositions to link number processing to spatial preferences may primarily function on a more general level, only some sort of systematic cultural training might shape this link in a consistently left-to-right direction. In a study by Patro, Fischer, Nuerk and Cress (2016), preschoolers formed a SNARC-like effect in different directions, depending on whether they were trained beforehand to move an object to the right or to the left. Apparently, the direction of numerosity-to-space mapping in preschool children is flexible and susceptible to spatial experience of different kinds and of different directionality, and this might account for the large variability of individual SNARC-like patterns observed in this age group.…”
Section: Spatial Arrangement Of Numerositiesmentioning
confidence: 99%