2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.02.004
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossing State Lines: Ethical and Clinical Considerations in Treating a Child With Catatonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[29][30][31][32] Restricted and delayed access to ECT in younger patients, however, further highlights the need for quickly identifying catatonia in children and adolescents, because they face barriers to accessing ECT in cases where it may be required. [33][34][35][36] Strengths of this study include a large sample size, making it the largest single sample of paediatric patients diagnosed with catatonia that has been reported. Additionally, the multicentre nature of the study and the inclusion of medical and psychiatric in-patients and out-patients enhances the generalisability of the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[29][30][31][32] Restricted and delayed access to ECT in younger patients, however, further highlights the need for quickly identifying catatonia in children and adolescents, because they face barriers to accessing ECT in cases where it may be required. [33][34][35][36] Strengths of this study include a large sample size, making it the largest single sample of paediatric patients diagnosed with catatonia that has been reported. Additionally, the multicentre nature of the study and the inclusion of medical and psychiatric in-patients and out-patients enhances the generalisability of the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 32 Restricted and delayed access to ECT in younger patients, however, further highlights the need for quickly identifying catatonia in children and adolescents, because they face barriers to accessing ECT in cases where it may be required. 33 36 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that states vary considerably in regulations pertaining to patient age, provider qualifications, and informed consent. 19,20 Future surveys should consider listing this as a response option.…”
Section: Ect Practice Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Administration in pediatric populations is likely limited by stigma, minimal education in psychiatric training programs, provider comfort, and access 36 . Pediatric ECT is also subject to state regulations with limitations regarding age, consent, and medical necessity 37-40 …”
Section: Questions To the Consultantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Pediatric ECT is also subject to state regulations with limitations regarding age, consent, and medical necessity. [37][38][39][40] Though there is international consensus that high-dose lorazepam and ECT are first-line in the management of pediatric catatonia, significant and heterogenous restrictions often limit their use. In addition, little is known regarding specific neural underpinnings or etiologies of pediatric catatonia.…”
Section: Questions To the Consultantsmentioning
confidence: 99%