Electroconvulsive Therapy in the United States

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to describe current US electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) practice, identify practice changes over time, and inform discussion of practice. Method Our anonymous survey was open on SurveyMonkey.com from January to June 2022. We sent invitations to providers identified using a Medicare provider database, an advanced PubMed search function, and professional group listservs. Participants were instructed to submit 1 survey per ECT site. We examined frequency of responses, tabulated individual comments, and grouped data for comparison. Results We received responses from 74 US practice sites encompassing 283 providers. Forty-nine percent (n = 36) of respondents practiced at general academic medical centers, 23% (n = 17) at general medical centers, 16% (n = 12) at freestanding psychiatric hospitals, and 7% (n = 5) at Veterans Affairs medical centers. Proportions of female (29%) and Black or African American (AA) (1%) ECT providers were markedly lower than proportions of female (60%) and Black or African American ECT patients (10%). The median number of treatments for a major depressive episode was 10. The preferred electrode placement was right unilateral (66%, n = 45). The favored dosing strategy was seizure threshold titration. Quantitative outcome measures were used by 89% (n = 66) of sites for depressive symptoms and 84% (n = 62) for cognitive adverse effects. Conclusions This survey is the first nationwide survey of ECT practice in nearly 40 years. Our results describe changes in practice over time and highlight the need to increase the number of female and Black or African American ECT providers. A comprehensive network of ECT sites could facilitate more frequent nationwide surveys.

Educating the next generation of psychiatrists in the use of clinical neuromodulation therapies: what should all psychiatry residents know?

“…Furthermore, Noorani et al. showed that 29% of ECT providers in the US are female, and only 1% are Black or African American ( 9 ). Clinician biases may be a potential source of ECT disparities among patients of color ( 10 ).…”

“…Research has shown that in the inpatient setting, ECT recipients were more likely to be female and white-non-Hispanic (7,8). Furthermore, Noorani et al showed that 29% of ECT providers in the US are female, and only 1% are Black or African American (9). Clinician biases may be a potential source of ECT disparities among patients of color (10).…”