2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09597-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-species retroviral transmission from macaques to human beings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
77
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6,12 People requiring close contact with NHPs may be at high risk for FV infection. 5,6,12 In the present study, FVs were detected in the tree shrew and shared the highest homology with M. Mulatta (99.3%) captive in the same area 2 years ago. This result indicates the possibility of transmission from NHPs to tree shrews.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,12 People requiring close contact with NHPs may be at high risk for FV infection. 5,6,12 In the present study, FVs were detected in the tree shrew and shared the highest homology with M. Mulatta (99.3%) captive in the same area 2 years ago. This result indicates the possibility of transmission from NHPs to tree shrews.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…4 In contrast to complex orthoretroviruses, which are sometimes highly pathogenic, FV infections are persistent and asymptomatic in their natural hosts. 3,5 FVs are transmitted zoonotically to humans, who are natural habitats for occupational exposure to NHP. 5,6 Despite the lack of pathogenicity of FV infection, the potential risk for the emergence of new strains of FV transmission to humans cannot be neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While humans are the only primates who are not naturally infected with FV, some human populations, such as monkey caretakers, veterinarians, and people in contact with monkeys in natural settings, such as monkey temple workers or bush meat hunters, are zoonotically infected with FV, with an incidence of 1 to 4% (15,38,44). Only a small number of FV ϩ humans have been identified, and there is as yet no evidence for horizontal transmission between humans, or pathogenic consequences (4,6). It has been speculated that primate FV are transmitted via saliva, based on documentation of humans zoonotically infected after sustaining monkey bites and the observation that virus can consistently be cocultured from saliva of infected monkeys (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the human-to-human transmission of SFV by blood transfusion has been investigated in a monkey model (Brooks et al, 2002;Khan and Kumar, 2006). To predict whether the antibody against HFV Tas can be suitable for use with other foamy viruses, we compared the homology of the foamy virus Tas protein in various species (Figure 7 and Table 1, the corresponding sequence in simian (SFV, NP_056806), macaque simian (MSFV, YP_001961124), monkey (AGMFSV, YP_001956724), horse (EFV, NP_054718), and cat (FFV, NP_056917)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%