2009
DOI: 10.1159/000264687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Sectional Hardness of Enamel from Human Teeth at Different Posteruptive Ages

Abstract: This study evaluated, by cross-sectional hardness (CSH), enamel maturation at different depths in sound human teeth at different posteruptive ages (12 per age group): unerupted (molars; control), 2–3 years (premolars), 4–10 years (premolars) and >10 years (molars). Cross-sectional Knoop hardness was measured at 10, 30, 50, 70, 90, 110, 220 and 330 mm depth from the surface. The data were subjected to two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s pairwise tests (a = 0.05). The CSH significantly increased with posterup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar changes in the mechanical properties of enamel have been found with aging (Park et al, 2008b;Cardoso et al, 2009). Cardoso et al (2009) revealed that the Knoop hardness of a cross-section of human enamel significantly increased with an increase in the posteruptive age.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar changes in the mechanical properties of enamel have been found with aging (Park et al, 2008b;Cardoso et al, 2009). Cardoso et al (2009) revealed that the Knoop hardness of a cross-section of human enamel significantly increased with an increase in the posteruptive age.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similar changes in the mechanical properties of enamel have been found with aging (Park et al, 2008b;Cardoso et al, 2009). Cardoso et al (2009) revealed that the Knoop hardness of a cross-section of human enamel significantly increased with an increase in the posteruptive age. Park et al (2008aPark et al ( , 2008b reported that older human enamel is more brittle and that the mean hardness and elastic modulus of older enamel near the occlusal surface are greater than that of younger enamel.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…43 Transverse microradiography (TMR) provides a quantitative measure of the mineral content, lesion depth, and attributes of the surface layer in enamel lesions. 44 CSMH measures the mechanical resilience (physical strength) of enamel, which cannot be determined by TMR. 45 According to ten Bosch and Angmar-Mansson, 46 SMH is a noninvasive technique and does not damage the enamel's macrostructure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%