2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Plane and In-Plane Heat Conductions in Layer-by-Layer Membrane: Molecular Dynamics Study

Abstract: A material with anisotropic heat conduction characteristics, which is determined by molecular scale structure, provides a way of controlling heat flow in nanoscale spaces. As such, here, we consider layer-by-layer (LbL) membranes, which are an electrostatic assembly of polyelectrolyte multilayers and are expected to have different heat conduction characteristics between cross-plane and in-plane directions. We constructed models of a poly­(acrylic acid)/polyethylenimine (PAA/PEI) LbL membrane sandwiched by char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(135 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By attracting atoms closer to each other, Coulomb interaction rises the repulsive vdW interaction, which enhances the thermal conductivity. This mechanism has also been discussed in previous works. So, it appears that hydrogen bonds, to which Coulomb interaction dominantly contributes, are essential to determine the adsorption structure of alcohol, which enables more favorable energy transfer.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…By attracting atoms closer to each other, Coulomb interaction rises the repulsive vdW interaction, which enhances the thermal conductivity. This mechanism has also been discussed in previous works. So, it appears that hydrogen bonds, to which Coulomb interaction dominantly contributes, are essential to determine the adsorption structure of alcohol, which enables more favorable energy transfer.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…From the force field energy function according to Equation ( 7), E angle and E bond tend to occupy a significant proportion of all function items and are demonstrated to be substantial in polymer thermal transport [36]. Hence, we focused on two main structural factors: SAM equilibrium angle of backbone θ eq and bond stretching K b defined in Formulas (8) and (9). The θ eq angle was among three SNO beads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, several types of SAMs have been proposed to improve thermal conductance. These SAMs include: cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) grafted on a Au surface [5,6], poly (acrylic acid) (PAA), polyacrylamide (PAM), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA),poly (acrylic acid)/polyethyleneimine (PAA/PEI) SAMs layer-by-layer-anchored on lithium cobalt oxide [7], and phosphonate-functionalized azastibazolium π-electron (PAE) SAMs on Pt electrodes [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the reactions between DGEBA and DDS, both epoxy‐primary and epoxy‐secondary amines as well as epoxy‐hydroxyl group reaction, hereinafter etherification, which is the reaction between the hydroxyl groups (generated by the epoxy‐primary amine reactions) and the epoxy group were considered. Since a detailed explanation of the curing simulation method has been provided in a previous report, 29 the algorithm and a brief explanation of the simulation procedure 25,30,31,32,33,34,35,36 are described in Figure 3 and the Figure S1, respectively. The reaction probability p was calculated using the Arrhenius equation (Equation ). p=Aexp()EaRT where E a is the activation energy, R is the gas constant, and T is the local temperature around the reactive sites.…”
Section: Curing Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curing reactions of (b) epoxy and primary amine, (c) epoxy and secondary amine, and (d) epoxy and hydroxyl group. The molecular visualizations were produced by the VMD package, 41 previous report, 29 the algorithm and a brief explanation of the simulation procedure 25,30,31,32,33,34,35,36 are described in Figure 3 and the Figure S1, respectively. The reaction probability p was calculated using the Arrhenius equation Equation 1.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulations For Exothermic Reaction Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%