2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-listing and legal bonding: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chung (2006) argues that investor protection also affects the liquidity of ADRs. Licht (2003), Siegel (2005), and Burns et al (2007) challenge the legal bonding hypothesis for cross-listings in the US.…”
Section: Investor Protectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chung (2006) argues that investor protection also affects the liquidity of ADRs. Licht (2003), Siegel (2005), and Burns et al (2007) challenge the legal bonding hypothesis for cross-listings in the US.…”
Section: Investor Protectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is a vehicle through which a firm's management can 'bond' themselves to a legal system with more protections against management selfdealing or excessive consumption of private benefits of control, Burns and Bill (2006). Cross listing, helps improve on corporate governance.…”
Section: Why Firms Cross List Their Sharesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, cross-listing facilitates more mergers and acquisitions (M&As) in the host country (Burns, Francis, & Hasan, 2007;Kumar & Ramchand, 2008). M&As can be financed by cash or the acquirer's equity.…”
Section: Cross-listing and The Geographic Scope Of The Firmmentioning
confidence: 99%