2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9224734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Layer and SDN Based Routing Scheme for P2P Communication in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks

Abstract: Conventional routing protocols proposed for Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET) are usually inefficient and vulnerable for multi-hop data forwarding due to the unavailability of global information and inefficiencies in their route discovering schemes. However, with the recently emerged software defined vehicular network (SDVN) technologies, link stability can be better improved through the availability of global network information. Thus, in this paper, we present a novel software-defined network (SDN) based routin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation settings that is configured were compared between SDGR with SDN, SVAO with SDN and AODV without SDN. The results have shown that the average end-to-end delay, throughput, overhead and packet drop ratio are superior to the other three protocols [88]. Yang, L., et.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The simulation settings that is configured were compared between SDGR with SDN, SVAO with SDN and AODV without SDN. The results have shown that the average end-to-end delay, throughput, overhead and packet drop ratio are superior to the other three protocols [88]. Yang, L., et.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2020, 10, x; doi: FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 51 huge mechanical approaches appropriate to the development of associated and autonomous vehicles and unavoidable use of various new tangible gadgets introduced on-board vehicles that encourage in the different scope of agreeable vehicular security applications and programs (i.e., send the crash cautions, crisis vehicles help, (powerless) walker impact relief, overwhelm crossing point cautions and dangerous area cautions). These security applications are basic in nature, yet necessitate a low-dormancy foundation with the most extreme middle-of-the-road postponement running between 10 ms and 50 ms [8]. Moreover, advanced associated vehicles are outfitted with 120 sensors and this number is foreseen to increment up to 250 towards the end of 2020 [9].…”
Section: Application Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the time, it is likewise conceivable that the SDN controller is not reachable. The greater part of the exploration directed in earlier research did exclude such problems as they pursued the old style of the vehicular systems, for example, the specially ad-hoc on demand distance vector (AODV) [8] and global positioning system receiver (GPSR) [34]. Through an important association among SDN and the Internet of Vehicles (IoV), the idea of programming characterized SDN-IoV is developing.…”
Section: Sdn-based Intelligent Transportation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reward function is based on the difference between the number of vehicles that pass through the intersection during the last time interval and those that are staying. All used information is easily obtained from the traffic signal simulator (e.g., SUMO), which is based on a vehicular network [20,21]. Further, to improve the expansibility and stability of two agents in the traffic signal control, we build a deep neural network to map states to rewards.…”
Section: Problem Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%