2022
DOI: 10.1007/s41809-021-00092-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-language contributions of rapid automatized naming to reading accuracy and fluency in young adults: evidence from eight languages representing different writing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emphasis was on papers that bring in new perspectives from diverse scripts (with an emphasis on non-alphabetic ones) on how specific script features can impact reading processes/strategies and/or how they impact cognition. Some papers deal with a single script but highlight the specific features of the script in question and their cognitive-linguistic implications (i.e., papers by Bae et al, 2022;Inoue et al, 2022;Labusch et al, 2022;Yin et al, 2022) while some compare the scriptspecific influences on cognition across two or more scripts (i.e., papers by Georgiou et al, 2022;Mirza & Gottardo, 2022;Winskel & Perea, 2022). There are two non-empirical papers one on the 'script relativity hypothesis' (Pae, 2022) and another on 'biscriptality' (Vaid, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis was on papers that bring in new perspectives from diverse scripts (with an emphasis on non-alphabetic ones) on how specific script features can impact reading processes/strategies and/or how they impact cognition. Some papers deal with a single script but highlight the specific features of the script in question and their cognitive-linguistic implications (i.e., papers by Bae et al, 2022;Inoue et al, 2022;Labusch et al, 2022;Yin et al, 2022) while some compare the scriptspecific influences on cognition across two or more scripts (i.e., papers by Georgiou et al, 2022;Mirza & Gottardo, 2022;Winskel & Perea, 2022). There are two non-empirical papers one on the 'script relativity hypothesis' (Pae, 2022) and another on 'biscriptality' (Vaid, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%