2015
DOI: 10.1007/s41095-015-0017-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-depiction problem: Recognition and synthesis of photographs and artwork

Abstract: Cross-depiction is the recognition -and synthesis -of objects whether they are photographed, painted, drawn, etc. It is a significant yet underresearched problem. Emulating the remarkable human ability to recognise and depict objects in an astonishingly wide variety of depictive forms is likely to advance both the foundations and the applications of computer vision. In this paper we motivate the cross-depiction problem, explain why it is difficult, and discuss some current approaches. Our main conclusions are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such visual classifiers are generally trained on natural images, for which there is a copious amount of annotation (and which is often lacking for paintings). Unfortunately, as Hall et al observe [24], there is a drop in performance in training on natural images rather than paintings. So we ask, when it comes to classifying paintings using natural images as training data, what are we missing?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such visual classifiers are generally trained on natural images, for which there is a copious amount of annotation (and which is often lacking for paintings). Unfortunately, as Hall et al observe [24], there is a drop in performance in training on natural images rather than paintings. So we ask, when it comes to classifying paintings using natural images as training data, what are we missing?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] show that as paintings become more abstract, the performance of person detection degrades. [14,38] benchmark existing methods on artistic objects, but only propose improvements over older, non-convolutional techniques, which are greatly outperformed by neural networks. [37] provide a large dataset of artistic domains with per-image object annotations, but we found the labels were too coarse (due to multiple objects in the same image and no bounding box annotations) and the human annotations too sparse, to reliably perform recognition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We downloaded 1,391 paintings 1 which cover eight of our ten categories (except "giraffe" and "zebra"), and annotated these images with 2,834 bounding boxes. Note that another painting dataset exists [14] but it only contains four of the ten classes we consider. To maintain the same set of domains as those used in PACS, we also include 12,008 sketches from the Sketchy Database [31].…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifiers (deep CNNs) trained on real data are able to locate objects such as cars, cows and cathedrals (Crowley & Zisserman, 2016) if the artistic rendering is not very abstract. The problem of detecting/recognizing objects in any type of data, regardless if it is real or artistic, was named crossdepiction by Hall et al (Hall et al, 2015); however the problem is noted as being particular difficult and in the light of dedicated benchmarks , the results show plenty of space for improvement. A significant conclusion that arises is that all solutions that showed some degree of success did it for older artistic movements, where scene depiction was without particular abstraction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%