2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203817735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross Curricular Teaching and Learning in the Secondary School… Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This characterization of science arises in large part because a considerable amount of school science time is spent carrying out “recipe” experiments (also called closed enquiry investigations) that produce an outcome that is known prior to the investigation (Dudu & Vhurumuku, ; Sullivan‐Watts, Nowicki, Shim, & Young, ). Byrne and Brodie (, p. 28) also draw attention to and criticize the pedagogy that persists in science classrooms saying that the content is all too often “designed mainly to educate a minority of future scientists rather than equipping the majority with the scientific understanding, reasoning and literacy they require to engage as citizens in the twenty‐first century.” These authors add to their case for reform by pointing to research which shows that students frequently find science at school to be boring and irrelevant to their lives and that the numbers of students choosing to study science is in decline (Byrne & Brodie, ). In response to these findings in Europe, Australia and elsewhere curriculum writers have sought ways to encourage students to see science in a more realistic and positive way (Osborne & Dillon, ; Tytler, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characterization of science arises in large part because a considerable amount of school science time is spent carrying out “recipe” experiments (also called closed enquiry investigations) that produce an outcome that is known prior to the investigation (Dudu & Vhurumuku, ; Sullivan‐Watts, Nowicki, Shim, & Young, ). Byrne and Brodie (, p. 28) also draw attention to and criticize the pedagogy that persists in science classrooms saying that the content is all too often “designed mainly to educate a minority of future scientists rather than equipping the majority with the scientific understanding, reasoning and literacy they require to engage as citizens in the twenty‐first century.” These authors add to their case for reform by pointing to research which shows that students frequently find science at school to be boring and irrelevant to their lives and that the numbers of students choosing to study science is in decline (Byrne & Brodie, ). In response to these findings in Europe, Australia and elsewhere curriculum writers have sought ways to encourage students to see science in a more realistic and positive way (Osborne & Dillon, ; Tytler, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdisciplinary learning can incorporate a number of disciplines but interdisciplinary learning and teaching between science and religion is sometimes viewed as 'difficult' and ethically volatile' (Byrne and Brodie, 2012). This combination appears to be more problematic than collaboration between subjects such as science and maths or between religious education and humanities subjects, because collaboration between science and religion education in schools is connected to the hotly contested, contemporary debate about the nature of the relationship between science and religion (Dawkins, 2006(Dawkins, , 2011Grayling, 2011Grayling, , 2013Harris, 20014, 2006;Hitchens, 2007).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Learning: Science and Religious Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pressures add up to mean that the teaching of epistemology is fragmented, compartmentalised and disjointed in schools, and also that learning about ways to ask and explore Big Questions in particular is likely to be neglected (Barnes, 2015; Billingsley et al., 2017; Byrne and Brodie, 2013; Konnemann et al., 2018; Sandoval, 2016). Further, many secondary school students are confined to narrow and stereotypical perceptions of science, religion and how they relate (Billingsley, 2013; Billingsley and Nassaji, 2019; Francis et al., 2018a; Fulljames et al., 1991; Hanley, 2008; Hokayem and BouJaoude, 2008; Paiva et al., 2016; Shipman et al., 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%