2007
DOI: 10.1163/138234007x191902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Cultural Negotiating: A Japanese-American Case Study from Higher Education

Abstract: Th is article discusses a cross-cultural negotiation process between a new Japanese university and an established American university to create a joint business venture -a dual-degree program. Th e parties failed to sign a contract, and there were indicators during negotiations pointing to the likelihood of a failed outcome. Negotiation style convergence was evident, with the Japanese adopting an erabi ('either-or') style and the Americans an awase ('more-or-less') style. Th e 7-Step framework used to structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenges surrounding intercultural negotiations have prompted the development of research aiming to offer prescriptive advice to practitioners (Prestwich, 2007; Wunderle, 2007; Brett and Okumura, 1998 and among others). Negotiation objectives, processes and outcomes, as well as the behaviors of negotiators, have all been correlated with a number of cultural norms and values (Hall, 1976; Hofstede, 1991, 2001; Schwartz, 1994, 2014; Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner, 1993, 2004; House et al , 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges surrounding intercultural negotiations have prompted the development of research aiming to offer prescriptive advice to practitioners (Prestwich, 2007; Wunderle, 2007; Brett and Okumura, 1998 and among others). Negotiation objectives, processes and outcomes, as well as the behaviors of negotiators, have all been correlated with a number of cultural norms and values (Hall, 1976; Hofstede, 1991, 2001; Schwartz, 1994, 2014; Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner, 1993, 2004; House et al , 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%