2005
DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Cultural Differences in Relationship- and Group-Based Trust

Abstract: Two experiments explored differences in depersonalized trust (trust toward a relatively unknown target person) across cultures. Based on a recent theoretical framework that postulates predominantly different bases for group behaviors in Western cultures versus Eastern cultures, it was predicted that Americans would tend to trust people primarily based on whether they shared category memberships; however, trust for Japanese was expected to be based on the likelihood of sharing direct or indirect interpersonal l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
232
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
15
232
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also noteworthy that the current results show an interesting parallel with results from our previous research concerning cross-cultural differences in depersonalized trust (Yuki et al, 2005). As was true for women in the current study, in our earlier experiments the presence of a potential cross-group relationship increased trust more for Japanese than for Americans within the same allocator/dictator paradigm used in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also noteworthy that the current results show an interesting parallel with results from our previous research concerning cross-cultural differences in depersonalized trust (Yuki et al, 2005). As was true for women in the current study, in our earlier experiments the presence of a potential cross-group relationship increased trust more for Japanese than for Americans within the same allocator/dictator paradigm used in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This paradigm has previously proven to be a reliable method for investigating cross-cultural differences in depersonalized trust (Yuki, Maddux, Brewer, & Takemura, 2005). For example, Yuki and colleagues (2005) showed that although American participants trusted ingroup members more than outgroup members (regardless of the presence of crossgroup relationship connections), Japanese participants showed no differences in trust toward ingroup members and outgroup members who had a potential cross-group relationship connection.…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, users of online forums who are more connected to other users may express higher trust in information provided by other members than users who are less connected [52]. Similarly, we may argue that in a corporate Twitter channel, people who are more connected with the channel are more likely to have stronger ties with the organization that manages the channel.…”
Section: Engagement and Informednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much research on basic trust differences across cultures [34,35]. Core values play a significant role in base levels of trust as a cognitive factor, but trust is also a dynamic property of relationships in context.…”
Section: Social Capital Factors and Intellectual Capital In Transnatimentioning
confidence: 99%