Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Persian version of Fremantle Knee Awareness Questionnaire

Hedayati, Rozita; Amjadian, Farnaz; Ebadi, Abbas; Ehsani, Fatemeh

doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.10.009

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The internal consistency reliability was evaluated by using the Cronbach's α coefficient with a value above 0.70 (Hedayati et al, 2021), indicating acceptable congruence of the internal construct. For dichotomous variables, the score is 0 or 1, and the Cronbach's α coefficient is not calculated.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals

Chen

et al. 2022

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals. Design This study utilized a cross‐sectional design. Methods Authorization was obtained from the authors of the original scale to translate the scale and perform cross‐cultural debugging. From August 2020 to November 2020, 573 health professionals were randomly selected from primary, secondary and tertiary hospitals in Huzhou to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals. Results The Chinese version of the scale contains 49 items. The internal consistency Cronbach's α was 0.958 for the total scale and 0.791–0.956 for each dimension. The test–retest reliability was 0.973. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness degree of the model is good (χ2/df = 1.347, IFI = 0.924, TLI = 0.913, CFI = 0.922, GFI = 0.841, AGFI = 0.815, RMR = 0.011, RMSEA = 0.035). Conclusion The Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies is reliable and valid, which is a credible and effective tool to assess the level of health literacy competencies in Chinese health professionals. Patient or public contribution Health professionals with good health literacy competencies can provide patient‐specific treatment and guidance to promote healthy outcomes for patients.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals

Chen

et al. 2022

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Portuguese-Brazil of NuHISS, Enlight, and uMARS

Vasconcelos,

Viana,

Duarte

et al. 2024

Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychometric Analysis of the questionnaires for the assessment of lower limbs available in Italian version: a systematic review

Barni

Carrasco-Vega

Martín-Martín

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The present study aims to analyze the structural and psychometric properties of the questionnaires published in Italian to evaluate the lower limbs. Material and Methods two blinded researcher performed a literature searches on the databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane, Dialnet, Cinahl, Embase, and PEDro databases. For the Keywords was using the Boolean operators "OR" and "AND": lower limb, hip, knee, foot and ankle, questionnaire, Italian, psychometric, validity and Validation. In each of the selected articles, the structural characteristics and, secondly, the psychometric characteristics were analysed. Results A great heterogeneity is observed in the number of items that made up each questionnaire, ranging between 4 and 42; most of the questionnaires are completed in less than 10 min, with some exceptions. Half of the selected questionnaires (16/32) presented subcategories. The reliability of the vast majority of the questionnaires was good or excellent. The criterion validity was very heterogeneous among the questionnaires identified. The construct validity was calculated at 4/32, while the sensitivity and the Standard error measurement (SEM) were 8/32, respectively. Conclusion The Italian versions of the questionnaires studied to evaluate the lower limbs show good essential structural and psychometric characteristics, also comparable to versions in other languages.

show abstract

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Persian version of Fremantle Knee Awareness Questionnaire

Cited by 3 publications

References 38 publications

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Portuguese-Brazil of NuHISS, Enlight, and uMARS

Psychometric Analysis of the questionnaires for the assessment of lower limbs available in Italian version: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About