2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9356-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, Internal Consistency and Validation of the Spinal Function Sort (SFS) for French- and German-Speaking Patients with Back Complaints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
17
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All questionnaires used were the validated French versions [28,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Observational measures.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All questionnaires used were the validated French versions [28,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Observational measures.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large limits of agreement scores in health outcome measure are common in pain patients [33, 39, 40]. As already stated there are no cut-off points of LoA [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-efficacy in execution of activities which involve the spine was measured with the Spinal Function Sort (SFS) [33]. The instrument contains 50 drawings with simple descriptions of activities that involve the spine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant part was selected after expert evaluation and testing within the clinical setting. SFS has very good retest-reliability (ICC = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-1.00) (Borloz, Trippolini, Ballabeni, Luthi, & Deriaz, 2012;Trippolini, Dijkstra, Geertzen, & Reneman, 2015).…”
Section: Primary Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%