2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9403-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Safety of Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Whiplash Associated Disorders

Abstract: Introduction Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) are a burden for both individuals and society. It is recommended to evaluate patients with WAD at risk of chronification to enhance rehabilitation and promote an early return to work. In patients with low back pain (LBP), functional capacity evaluation (FCE) contributes to clinical decisions regarding fitness-for-work. FCE should have demonstrated sufficient clinimetric properties. Reliability and safety of FCE for patients with WAD is unknown. Methods Thirty-tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is growing research on the reliability, validity, and clinical utility of FCEs in different occupational patient populations. 25,75,213,214 For example, in a cohort of 354 patients with chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders, FCE scores were responsive to a functional restoration program and predicted successful return to work 1 year after rehabilitation. 75 Although performance-based measures provide objective information, they do not capture one's functioning in the context of their work, home, or community environment.…”
Section: Assessment Of Physical Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing research on the reliability, validity, and clinical utility of FCEs in different occupational patient populations. 25,75,213,214 For example, in a cohort of 354 patients with chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders, FCE scores were responsive to a functional restoration program and predicted successful return to work 1 year after rehabilitation. 75 Although performance-based measures provide objective information, they do not capture one's functioning in the context of their work, home, or community environment.…”
Section: Assessment Of Physical Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…wrist) where no tissue damage is required to provoke pain and alter functionality [9]. Grip strength has been included as a tool to measure functional capacity in cervical whiplash [10]. Entrapment of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel has been suggested as an associated component to the chronic pain of the upper limb in patients with cervical whiplash [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six articles address the clinical measurement properties of this FCE ranging from good to excellent quality (67%–92%). There was evidence that the FCE was stable over test-retest time of 7–14 days 31 32. These measures demonstrate longer stability over time compared with self-report measures such as the Neck Disability Index (NDI) which has demonstrated test-retest reliability within only a short period of 0–3 days 28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The 12 articles that were included for review provided properties on the following functional based tests: functional capacity evaluations (FCE),29–34 The Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment work simulator II (BTEWS II),35 Functional Impairment Test- Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA),36 as well as items off of a physiotherapy test package including a cervical and lumbar Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE-C, PILE-L) test37–40 and 2×20 m with burden walking test (2×20M-WWB) 37–40. Descriptions of all functional-based tests and their relevant subtasks are provided in online supplementary appendix D.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation