Cross-cultural adaptation of the JPF-Questionnaire for German-speaking patients with functional temporomandibular joint disorders

Undt, Gerhard; Murakami, Ken-Ichiro; Clark, Glenn T.; Ploder, Oliver; Dem, Alexander; Lang, Thomas; Wiesinger, G.

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2005.12.005

Cited by 19 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The questionnaire consists of a visual analogue scale (VAS), eight questions about pain, five about jaw dysfunction, and 18 about daily activities; the verbal items were scored from zero to four points; the range of time being evaluated covered the previous week. A cross-cultural version of the questionnaire for use in German-speaking patients with temporomandibular disorders was developed and validated (Undt et al, 2006). The Japanese version of the questionnaire has not been validated so far, but significant positive correlations between the VAS and the three subtests were found.…”

Section: The Jpf-questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Jaw Pain and Function (JPF)-Questionnaire, used in this investigation, is a self-rating scale for measuring pain and dysfunction resulting from temporomandibular joint disorders (Clark et al, 1989a,b). For enabling direct comparison of the clinical results achieved in patients following arthroscopic surgery at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyoto University, Japan, with a group of patients who underwent open surgery at the Department for Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, a German version of the JPF-Questionnaire was used which had been developed earlier and had proved both valid and reliable under test-retest conditions (Undt et al, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Open versus arthroscopic surgery for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: A retrospective study comparing two centres’ results using the Jaw Pain and Function Questionnaire

Undt

Murakami

Rasse

et al. 2006

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Jpf-questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open versus arthroscopic surgery for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: A retrospective study comparing two centres’ results using the Jaw Pain and Function Questionnaire

Undt

Murakami

Rasse

et al. 2006

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The questionnaire has been validated to reliably distinguish between normal and TMD subjects with up to 98% sensitivity and 100% specificity when a cut off score of 6 is used for responses. 29 The questionnaire has been translated for use in Germanic, 30 and we prepared a French version for use in Lille, as a standard assessment of presence and severity of TMD. 18 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

ENPP1 and ESR1 genotypes associated with subclassifications of craniofacial asymmetry and severity of temporomandibular disorders

Chung

Richards

Nicot

et al. 2017

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction We investigated if ACTN3, ENPP1, ESR1, PITX1 and PITX2 genes which contribute to sagittal and vertical malocclusion also contribute to facial asymmetries and TMD before and after orthodontic and orthognathic surgery treatment. Methods One hundred seventy four dentofacial deformity patients were diagnosed as symmetric or subdivided into four asymmetric groups according to PA cephalometric measurements. TMD exam diagnosis and Jaw Pain and Function-(JPF) questionnaires assessed presence and severity of TMD. Results Fifty two % of patients were symmetric and forty eight % asymmetric. The asymmetry classification demonstrated significant cephalometric differences between symmetric and asymmetric groups, and across the four asymmetric subtypes: Group 1 - mandibular body asymmetry, Group 2 - ramus asymmetry, Group 3 - atypical asymmetry and Group 4 - “C-shaped” asymmetry. ENPP1 SNP-rs6569759 associated with asymmetry Group 1(p=0.004), and rs858339 with asymmetry Group 3 (p=0.002). ESR1 SNP-rs164321 associated with asymmetry Group 4 (p=0.019). These results are confirmed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) that showed three principal components explaining almost 80% of the variation seen in the studied group. PC1 and PC2 were associated with ESR1 SNP-rs3020318 (p<0.05). Diagnoses of disc displacement with reduction, masticatory muscle myalgia and arthralgia were highly prevalent in the asymmetry groups and all had strong statistical association to ENPP1 rs858339. The average JPF scores for asymmetric subjects before surgery (JPF=7), were significantly higher than symmetric subjects (JPF=2). Patients with asymmetry Group 3 reported the highest preoperative JPF scores and Group 2 and 3 were most likely to be cured of TMD one year after treatment. Conclusions PA cephalometrics can classify asymmetry into distinct groups; identify probability of TMD and genotype associations. Orthodontic and orthognathic treatment of facial asymmetry is very effective at eliminating TMD in most patients.

show abstract

“…Admittedly, there are at least seven additional studies that described the development of other self-report measures not assessed in this study as the subjects included on these projects were younger than 18 years of age. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Given the prevalence studies indicating average age of presentation to be between 20 and 40 years, it was decided a priori that the focus of this review be on patients over 18 years of age. A future systematic review would be helpful to examine the psychometric properties of self-report outcome measures developed in studies with adolescent and young adult patients.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The psychometric properties of self-report outcome measures in temporomandibular dysfunction

Emerson

Mischke

Lulofs-MacPherson

et al. 2014

Physical Therapy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) demonstrates a variety of clinical manifestations. While there are some well-documented self-report outcome measures for diagnostics and screening of TMD, these scales are often not utilized in physical therapy (PT) when assessing the patient's self-reported functional limitations and disability. Further, there is a lack of understanding of which self-report outcome measures in TMD have sound psychometric properties. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the psychometric properties of commonly used self-reported outcome measures in adults with TMD undergoing conservative management. Methods: A comprehensive and systematic search of articles published in PubMed, CINAHL, Dentistry and Oral Science, and PsycINFO databases through June 2013 was completed. Inclusion criteria included (1) any article that described the psychometric properties of a self-report outcome measure utilized in TMD, (2) subjects were adults .18 years, and (3) the full text article was available in English. Major Findings: Thirteen articles were discovered with eight reporting psychometric analysis. Ten studies reported on reliability, with good internal consistency noted but test-retest reliability varied greatly. Face and content validity was reported for most measures; only 50% of the studies reported on construct validity. Other psychometric concepts such as responsiveness, duration to administer, feasibility, interpretability, and acceptability were less reported. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review demonstrate that eight non-diagnostic self-report outcome measures in adults diagnosed with TMD have undergone some psychometric development or analysis.

show abstract

Cross-cultural adaptation of the JPF-Questionnaire for German-speaking patients with functional temporomandibular joint disorders

Cited by 19 publications

References 25 publications

Open versus arthroscopic surgery for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: A retrospective study comparing two centres’ results using the Jaw Pain and Function Questionnaire

Open versus arthroscopic surgery for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: A retrospective study comparing two centres’ results using the Jaw Pain and Function Questionnaire

ENPP1 and ESR1 genotypes associated with subclassifications of craniofacial asymmetry and severity of temporomandibular disorders

The psychometric properties of self-report outcome measures in temporomandibular dysfunction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About