2018
DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural adaptation of research tools: A study on the Cultural Intelligence Scale adaptation in Slovenian

Abstract: The article examines the cross-cultural transferability of a widely accepted cross-cultural assessment tool – the Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS) – using research conducted in Slovenia and insights from the American and Slovenian researchers who translated the tool into Slovene and adapted it for use in Slovenia. In the context of a qualitative focus group based study, the researchers look at the specific characteristics of CQS perceptions within the Slovenian sample (two focus groups – one in the capital an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysing interview data ensued alongside its collection iteratively using the constant comparative method, [52] which determined the point of data saturation. Provisional themes emerging from this were discussed with PR and LD to gain a more culturally astute insight, minimising risks of cross-cultural bias [53]. Conventional thematic and deviant case analyses were conducted by DK after interviewing to produce accurate reflections of the participant voice [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysing interview data ensued alongside its collection iteratively using the constant comparative method, [52] which determined the point of data saturation. Provisional themes emerging from this were discussed with PR and LD to gain a more culturally astute insight, minimising risks of cross-cultural bias [53]. Conventional thematic and deviant case analyses were conducted by DK after interviewing to produce accurate reflections of the participant voice [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysing interview data ensued alongside its collection iteratively using the constant comparative method, [55] which determined the point of data saturation. Provisional themes emerging from this were discussed with PR and LD to gain a more culturally astute insight, minimising risks of cross-cultural bias [56]. Conventional thematic analysis and deviant case analysis were conducted by DK after interviewing nished to produce accurate re ections of the participant voice [57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%