Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the
Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain Questionnaire

Alageel, Musab; Turki, Abdullah Al; Alhandi, Ali A; Alohali, Rawa; Alsalem, Rakan; Aleissa, Sami

doi:10.1055/a-1031-0947

Cited by 11 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 16 publications

(21 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 20 articles were selected for this review; out of which 12 articles were from Saudi Arabia [ 1 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], two each from Morocco [ 36 , 37 ], Egypt [ 38 , 39 ], and Jordan [ 40 , 41 ], and one each from Tunisia [ 14 ], and Kuwait [ 42 ]. A total of 10 knee-related outcome measures were cross-culturally adapted, and their psychometric measurement properties were evaluated in the Arabic language.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They were Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) [ 1 , 14 , 37 ], knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 38 , 39 , 43 ] knee outcome survey- activities of daily living scale (KOS-ADLS) [ 30 , 42 ]. Oxford knee score [ 1 ], anterior knee pain scale [ 31 ], osteoarthritis of knee and hip health-related quality of life (OAKHQoL) scale [ 37 ], Kujala patellofemoral pain scoring system [ 40 , 41 ], intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain questionnaire (ICOAP) [ 25 ], short version of anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI) [ 26 ], and Tegner activity scale (TAS) [ 27 ]. WOMAC was validated in three different ways, i.e., reduced WOMAC [ 44 ], original WOMAC [ 37 ], and Sfax WOMAC [ 14 ], that were evaluated in three different nations, i.e., Saudi Arabia [ 1 ], Morocco [ 37 ], and Tunisia [ 14 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Apart from assessing boxes by standards (items), we evaluated each box by updated criteria for good measurement properties [ 22 ]. Overall qualities of each PROM were determined through a modified GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) [ 25 ]: (1) risk of bias-the methodological quality of the studies; (2) inconsistency- unexplained inconsistency of results across studies; (3) imprecision -total sample size of the available studies; and (4) indirectness-evidence from different populations than the population of interest in the review [ 18 ] by combining scores of COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) [ 21 ]. During the quality assessment process, only measurement properties (boxes) reported in each PROM were evaluated, and other boxes were considered NR (not reported).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Knee-Related Outcome Measures Translated, Cross-Culturally Adapted, and Validated in Arabic Language

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the previous two decades, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been well tested, and the tools were validated in different languages across the globe. This systematic review aimed to identify the knee disease-specific outcome tools in Arabic and evaluate their methodological quality of psychometric properties of the most promising tools based on the COSMIN checklist and PRISMA guidelines. Articles published in English, from the inception of databases until the date of search (10 August 2022), were included. Articles without at least one psychometric property (reliability, validity, and responsiveness) evaluation, and articles other than in the English language, were excluded from the study. The key terms [“Arabic” AND “Knee” AND (“Questionnaire” OR “Scale”)] were used in three databases, i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) in the advanced search strategy. Key terms were either in the title or abstract for PubMed. Key words were in the topic (TS) for WoS. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) risk of bias checklist was used to evaluate the methodological quality of psychometric properties of the Arabic knee-related outcome measures. A total of 99 articles were identified in PubMed, SCOPUS, and WoS. After passing inclusion and exclusion criteria, 20 articles describing 22 scales from five countries were included in this review. The instruments validated in the Arabic language are Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), knee outcome survey- activities of daily living scale (KOS-ADLS), Oxford knee score (OKS), anterior knee pain scale, osteoarthritis of knee and hip health-related quality of life (OAKHQoL) scale, Lysholm knee score (LKS), international documentation committee subjective knee form (IKDC), intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) questionnaire, Kujala patellofemoral pain scoring system (PFPSS), anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) and osteoarthritis quality of life questionnaire (OAQoL),. All were found to have good test-retest reliability (Intra Correlation Coefficient), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), and construct validity (Visual Analog Scale, Short Form-12, RAND-36, etc.). Of 20 instruments available to assess self-reported knee symptoms and function, 12 were validated in the Saudi Arabian population. Among them, KOS-ADLS is the best PROM to be used in various knee conditions, followed by KOOS and WOMAC. The assessed methodological quality of evidence says that the knee Arabic PROMs are reliable instruments to evaluate knee symptoms/function.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Knee-Related Outcome Measures Translated, Cross-Culturally Adapted, and Validated in Arabic Language

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(21) These disease-speci c questionnaires have been translated from English and culturally adapted to many languages including Arabic. (24,25) They have demonstrated validity in re ecting patient opinions about their condition. (25)(24) However, no questionnaire has shown superior measurement properties over the others.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Harrus Hip Score

Alshaygy

Alageel

Aljurayyan

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The goal of this study was to translate the Harris Hip (HHS) questionnaire into the Arabic language with cross-cultural adaptation to include and benefit Arabic speaking communities as it is the most widely used instrument for disease-specific hip joint evaluation and measurement of total hip arthroplasty outcome. Methods: This questionnaire was translated following A clear and user-friendly guideline protocol. The Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the reliability and internal consistency of the items of HHS. Additionally, The constructive validity of HHS was evaluated against the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF 36). Results: A total of 100 participants were included in this study, of which 30 participants were re-evaluated for reliability testing. Cronbach’s alpha of the total score of Arabic HHS is 0.528 and after the standardization, it changed to 0.742 which is within the recommended range (0.7-0.9). Lastly, The correlation between HHS and SF 36 was r=0.71 (p<0.001) which represents a strong correlation between Arabic HHS and SF-36. Conclusion: Based on the results, we believe that the Arabic HHS can be used by clinicians, researchers, and patients to evaluate and report hip pathologies and total hip arthroplasty treatment efficacy.

show abstract

“…To the editor, An interesting paper was recently published regarding the translation and validation of the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire into the Arabic language [1]. The procedures described in the manuscript are clear and follow the recommended guidelines for appropriate translation of a self-reported measurement scale [2].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Letter to the Editor

Farrag

AlZahrani²,

Elsayed

2020

Sports Med Int Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain Questionnaire

Cited by 11 publications

References 16 publications

A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Knee-Related Outcome Measures Translated, Cross-Culturally Adapted, and Validated in Arabic Language

A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Knee-Related Outcome Measures Translated, Cross-Culturally Adapted, and Validated in Arabic Language

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Harrus Hip Score

Letter to the Editor

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About